Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Why Clinical Practice Guidelines Hinder Rather Than Help
1Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Children's Hospital, Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Insights
Asthma guidelines for children have been ineffective. Asthma specialty programs, not general guidelines, significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce hospitalizations.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Public Health
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Asthma remains the primary cause of pediatric hospitalizations.
- Existing national asthma guidelines have failed to reduce urgent care visits and hospitalizations.
- Specialist care consistently shows superior outcomes compared to non-specialist care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of current asthma guidelines versus specialized care programs.
- To identify strategies for improving pediatric asthma management outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Review of evidence comparing outcomes under national asthma guidelines versus specialized asthma programs.
- Analysis of pediatric hospitalization and urgent care data related to asthma control.
Main Results:
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) asthma guidelines, despite revisions, have not decreased the high rates of pediatric asthma-related urgent care and hospitalizations.
- Pediatric patients managed by asthma specialists demonstrate significantly better health outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Current asthma guidelines disseminated to general practitioners are insufficient for improving pediatric asthma control.
- Evidence strongly supports the implementation of dedicated asthma specialty programs to effectively alter outcomes in children with asthma.
Abstract:
Asthma is the leading cause of hospitalization among children. Recognition of inadequate control of asthma stimulated the development of Guidelines by an Expert Panel convened by the National Asthma and Prevention Program of the National Institute of Health. Those Guidelines with several revisions spanning 24 years were well-intentioned but ineffective at altering the continued high prevalence of urgent care and hospitalization among children with asthma. Meanwhile, there is strong evidence that specialists, with their greater clinical experience and knowledge have demonstrated excellent outcome compared with non-specialist care. It is time to recognize that there is strong evidence-based data that asthma specialty programs and not Guidelines disseminated to generalists alter the outcome of asthma.
More Related Videos
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:06Legal Guidelines for Documentation
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
01:27Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
01:30Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.