Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
Published on: February 5, 2021
Selective Heart Rate Reduction With Ivabradine Increases Central Blood Pressure in Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Stefano F Rimoldi1, Franz H Messerli1, David Cerny2
1From the Department of Cardiology and Clinical Research, Inselspital, University of Bern Hospital, Bern, Switzerland (S.F.R., F.H.M., D.C., S.G., T.T., C.S.); and Department of Pharmacology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm UMR 970, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France (S.L.). Messerli.f@gmail.com stefano.rimoldi@insel.ch.
Insights
Ivabradine did not benefit coronary artery disease patients, as its heart rate lowering effect increased central systolic pressure and stroke volume. This rise in pressure may counteract potential benefits of reduced heart rate.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Beta-blockade benefits heart rate reduction post-myocardial infarction.
- Ivabradine failed to show benefits in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients in prior trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if ivabradine's inefficacy in CAD patients is linked to its effects on central aortic pressure.
Main Methods:
- 46 patients with stable CAD received either placebo or ivabradine for 6 months.
- Central blood pressure and stroke volume measured via left heart catheterization.
- 24-hour ECG monitoring for heart rate determination.
Main Results:
- Ivabradine increased central systolic pressure by 11 mm Hg (P=0.02) and stroke volume by 21.2 mL (P=0.002).
- Heart rate decrease correlated with increases in central systolic pressure and stroke volume.
- Myocardial oxygen consumption estimates remained unchanged with ivabradine.
Conclusions:
- Ivabradine's heart rate reduction in CAD patients is associated with increased central systolic pressure.
- This pressure increase may negate the therapeutic benefits of heart rate lowering with ivabradine in CAD.
Abstract:
Heart rate (HR) lowering by β-blockade was shown to be beneficial after myocardial infarction. In contrast, HR lowering with ivabradine was found to confer no benefits in 2 prospective randomized trials in patients with coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that this inefficacy could be in part related to ivabradine's effect on central (aortic) pressure. Our study included 46 patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease who were randomly allocated to placebo (n=23) or ivabradine (n=23) in a single-blinded fashion for 6 months. Concomitant baseline medication was continued unchanged throughout the study except for β-blockers, which were stopped during the study period. Central blood pressure and stroke volume were measured directly by left heart catheterization at baseline and after 6 months. For the determination of resting HR at baseline and at follow-up, 24-hour ECG monitoring was performed. Patients on ivabradine showed an increase of 11 mm Hg in central systolic pressure from 129±22 mm Hg to 140±26 mm Hg (P=0.02) and in stroke volume by 86±21.8 to 107.2±30.0 mL (P=0.002). In the placebo group, central systolic pressure and stroke volume remained unchanged. Estimates of myocardial oxygen consumption (HR×systolic pressure and time-tension index) remained unchanged with ivabradine.The decrease in HR from baseline to follow-up correlated with the concomitant increase in central systolic pressure (r=-0.41, P=0.009) and in stroke volume (r=-0.61, P<0.001). In conclusion, the decrease in HR with ivabradine was associated with an increase in central systolic pressure, which may have antagonized possible benefits of HR lowering in coronary artery disease patients. CLINICAL TRIALSURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01039389.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
04:37Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Decreased pulse rate
There are specific risk factors that can elevate the likelihood of developing bradycardia. Advanced age is a significant factor, with...