Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Punishment01:27

Punishment

1.2K
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
1.2K
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

205
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
205
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

3.3K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
3.3K
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

16
Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
16
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

628
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
628
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How risk communication shapes individual response to climate change: an experimental study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Everyday norms have become more permissive over time and vary across cultures.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Social norm strength and norm change.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

FeCl<sub>2</sub>·4H<sub>2</sub>O-Mediated Conversion of the CF<sub>3</sub> Group into a Series of Esters: A Strategy for the Synthesis of Fe<sup>II</sup> Complexes with In Situ-Formed Ester-Containing Ligands.

Inorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Why social norms may fail us when we need them most.

Current opinion in psychology·2024
Same author

Co-evolution of behaviour and beliefs in social dilemmas: estimating material, social, cognitive and cultural determinants.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

15.0K

Counter-Punishment, Communication, and Cooperation among Partners.

Giulia Andrighetto1, Jordi Brandts2, Rosaria Conte3

  • 1Institute of Cognitive Science and Technology-CNRRome, Italy; San Domenico di Fiesole, European University InstituteFiesole, Italy.

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|April 20, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Communication significantly boosts cooperation in public goods games. Enabling communication, whether asking for contributions or explaining punishment, increases group success and earnings, regardless of counter-punishment.

Keywords:
accountabilitycooperationexperimentsnormspunishment

More Related Videos

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.1K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

15.0K
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.1K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Experimental Economics
  • Game Theory

Background:

  • Cooperation is vital for public goods provision.
  • Punishment mechanisms can sustain cooperation but may be complex.
  • The role of communication in these environments requires further study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of communication on cooperation in a public goods game with punishment and counter-punishment.
  • To differentiate the effects of communication about contributions versus communication about punishment.

Main Methods:

  • Four experimental treatments were implemented in a public goods game over 30 rounds.
  • Treatments varied in communication possibilities: no communication, communication about contributions, communication about punishment, and both.
  • Participants had fixed group identifiers to track behavior.

Main Results:

  • All three treatments with communication led to significantly higher contributions than the baseline (no communication).
  • No significant differences in contributions were found among the three communication treatments.
  • Counter-punishment did not negatively impact cooperation levels.

Conclusions:

  • Communication is the key factor driving increased cooperation and earnings in this experimental setup.
  • The presence of communication enhances cooperation regardless of counter-punishment opportunities.
  • Fixed group identifiers facilitate the effectiveness of communication.