Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and
Shuang Huang1, Mallorie H Fiero2, Melanie L Bell2
1Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA shhuang@email.arizona.edu.
Background/Aims:
Generalized estimating equations are a common modeling approach used in cluster randomized trials to account for within-cluster correlation. It is well known that the sandwich variance estimator is biased when the number of clusters is small (≤40), resulting in an inflated type I error rate. Various bias correction methods have been proposed in the statistical literature, but how adequately they are utilized in current practice for cluster randomized trials is not clear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of generalized estimating equation bias correction methods in recently published cluster randomized trials and demonstrate the necessity of such methods when the number of clusters is small.
Methods:
Review of cluster randomized trials published between August 2013 and July 2014 and using generalized estimating equations for their primary analyses. Two independent reviewers collected data from each study using a standardized, pre-piloted data extraction template. A two-arm cluster randomized trial was simulated under various scenarios to show the potential effect of a small number of clusters on type I error rate when estimating the treatment effect. The nominal level was set at 0.05 for the simulation study.
Results:
Of the 51 included trials, 28 (54.9%) analyzed 40 or fewer clusters with a minimum of four total clusters. Of these 28 trials, only one trial used a bias correction method for generalized estimating equations. The simulation study showed that with four clusters, the type I error rate ranged between 0.43 and 0.47. Even though type I error rate moved closer to the nominal level as the number of clusters increases, it still ranged between 0.06 and 0.07 with 40 clusters.
Conclusions:
Our results showed that statistical issues arising from small number of clusters in generalized estimating equations is currently inadequately handled in cluster randomized trials. Potential for type I error inflation could be very high when the sandwich estimator is used without bias correction.
Related Concept Videos
01:13Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
01:20Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
01:23Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
01:20Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
01:22Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
01:23Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis