Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.0K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.0K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

17.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
17.0K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

579
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
579
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

926
926

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A sensitivity analysis of methodological variables associated with microbiome measurements.

Microbiology spectrum·2025
Same author

Evaluation of Lateral Resolution of Light Field Cameras.

Optical engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif.)·2024
Same author

The Certification of Standard Reference Material 1979: Powder Diffraction Line Profile Standard for Crystallite Size Analysis.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same author

Estimation of a Minimum Allowable Structural Strength Based on Uncertainty in Material Test Data.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same author

High-volume, label-free imaging for quantifying single-cell dynamics in induced pluripotent stem cell colonies.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Evaluating Glyph Design for Showing Large-Magnitude-Range Quantum Spins.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2023
Same journal

Precise Numerical Differentiation of Thermodynamic Functions with Multicomplex Variables.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Characterization of 3-Dimensional Printing and Casting Materials for use in Computed Tomography and X-ray Imaging Phantoms.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

On The Quotient of a Centralized and a Non-centralized Complex Gaussian Random Variable.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Fast Methods for Finding Multiple Effective Influencers in Real Networks.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Disinfection of Respirators with Ultraviolet Radiation.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

DNA Origami Design: A How-To Tutorial.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

High-resolution, High-speed, Three-dimensional Video Imaging with Digital Fringe Projection Techniques
11:34

High-resolution, High-speed, Three-dimensional Video Imaging with Digital Fringe Projection Techniques

Published on: December 3, 2013

16.1K

Methods for Quantifying and Characterizing Errors in Pixel-Based 3D Rendering.

John G Hagedorn1, Judith E Terrill1, Adele P Peskin1

  • 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8911.

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
|April 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed methods to measure rendering errors for 3D graphics, including points, lines, and polygons. Our findings help improve the accuracy of computer graphics systems on different hardware.

Keywords:
computer graphicsmetrologypixel measurementrendering measurementscientific visualizationvirtual measurement

More Related Videos

Measuring Spatially- and Directionally-varying Light Scattering from Biological Material
11:57

Measuring Spatially- and Directionally-varying Light Scattering from Biological Material

Published on: May 20, 2013

14.0K
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

High-resolution, High-speed, Three-dimensional Video Imaging with Digital Fringe Projection Techniques
11:34

High-resolution, High-speed, Three-dimensional Video Imaging with Digital Fringe Projection Techniques

Published on: December 3, 2013

16.1K
Measuring Spatially- and Directionally-varying Light Scattering from Biological Material
11:57

Measuring Spatially- and Directionally-varying Light Scattering from Biological Material

Published on: May 20, 2013

14.0K
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Graphics
  • Geometric Modeling
  • Scientific Visualization

Background:

  • Pixel-based computer graphics systems are widely used for visual representation.
  • Quantifying rendering errors is crucial for ensuring visual fidelity and accuracy.
  • Existing methods for error measurement in 3D graphics rendering are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce novel methods for quantifying rendering errors in 3D graphics.
  • To develop specific error metrics for points, line segments, and polygons.
  • To analyze and characterize rendering errors across different hardware and conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of quantitative error metrics for 3D primitives (points, lines, polygons).
  • Application of these metrics to rendering processes using OpenGL.
  • Testing on two distinct hardware platforms under varied rendering scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Successful measurement and characterization of rendering errors.
  • Demonstration of performance differences across hardware platforms.
  • Analysis of error variations under different rendering conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The presented methods provide a robust framework for assessing 3D rendering accuracy.
  • Hardware and rendering conditions significantly impact error levels.
  • The error analysis approach can be extended to other areas of synthetic scene generation.