Clinical Practice Audit: Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Paediatric Cancer Patients with Broviac Catheter

K Weiss1, A Simon1, N Graf1

  • 1Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

Klinische Padiatrie
|April 21, 2016
PubMed

Insights

This audit of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) in paediatric oncology patients found issues with antibiotic dosing and choice. Improvements were seen in the prospective group, highlighting challenges in optimizing clinical workflows.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Microbiology
  • Clinical Pharmacy
  • Paediatric Oncology

Background:

  • Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) is crucial for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in patients undergoing procedures.
  • Paediatric oncology patients with central venous catheters (CVAD) have a higher risk of SSI.
  • Internal audits are essential for ensuring judicious antibiotic use in healthcare settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive audit of PAP practices in a German paediatric oncology centre.
  • To evaluate adherence to internal PAP guidelines for CVAD implantations.
  • To identify areas for improvement in antibiotic selection, dosing, and duration.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic audit of 97 CVAD implantations in 89 paediatric oncology patients was performed.
  • Data was collected retrospectively (2012-2014) and prospectively (2014-2015) after guideline implementation.
  • Surgical site infections (SSI) were monitored for up to 30 days post-operation.

Main Results:

  • Lower-than-recommended doses of Cefuroxim were frequently observed.
  • Inappropriate antibiotic choices (Cefotaxim, Clindamycin) occurred in a small number of cases.
  • PAP duration significantly improved from 22% to 91% adherence to ≤24 hours in the prospective group (p<0.001).
  • No surgical site infections (SSI) were detected in any patient.

Conclusions:

  • Significant opportunities exist to improve PAP practices in paediatric oncology settings, focusing on correct antibiotic dosing and selection.
  • The study highlights the challenges in optimizing standard clinical workflows for antibiotic prophylaxis.
  • Despite identified areas for improvement, no SSIs were observed, suggesting the current PAP protocols may still be effective.
Abstract