Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
Published on: December 9, 2025
Midfacial Soft-Tissue Changes after Paranasal Augmentation with Porous Polyethylene
Jung-Hyun Park1, Jin-Woo Kim1, Sun-Jong Kim1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Porous polyethylene implants effectively augment the paranasal area, showing significant soft-tissue changes. This predictable method offers high patient satisfaction with minimal complications for paranasal deficiency.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Paranasal deficiency can impact facial aesthetics and midface volume.
- Surgical augmentation aims to improve facial contours and proportions.
- Porous polyethylene is a biocompatible material used in craniofacial reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the soft-tissue response to porous polyethylene implants in paranasal augmentation.
- To compare outcomes between paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene and mandibular setback alone.
- To assess patient satisfaction and complications associated with porous polyethylene paranasal implants.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 33 patients undergoing paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene and mandibular setback, and 35 patients undergoing mandibular setback alone.
- Lateral cephalograms were used to measure soft-tissue changes in the paranasal area pre- and post-surgery (6 months).
- Patient satisfaction and complication rates were systematically analyzed.
Main Results:
- Paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene resulted in an average soft-tissue increase of 2.42 ± 0.33 mm.
- The ratio of soft-tissue change to implant thickness was 80.7%.
- No significant soft-tissue changes were observed in the control group (mandibular setback alone).
Conclusions:
- Porous polyethylene paranasal augmentation is a predictable surgical technique.
- The procedure leads to increased midface volume and improved lateral profile.
- High patient satisfaction and minimal complications, including no implant-related issues, were reported.
More Related Videos
07:16Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
12:19Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
Published on: July 1, 2013