Related Experiment Videos
Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Development and Validation of a Risk
Rajeev Subramanyam1, Samrat Yeramaneni, Mohamed Monir Hossain
1From the *Department of Anesthesia, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; †Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio; and ‡Process Improvement, James M Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Insights
A new risk tool identifies children under 18 at risk for perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) during ambulatory anesthesia. Key factors include young age, certain health statuses, and undergoing surgery, enabling preoperative risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Clinical Risk Prediction
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) are the most frequent serious complications in pediatric anesthesia.
- Developing a validated tool to predict PRAEs in children undergoing ambulatory procedures is crucial for patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a risk prediction tool for PRAEs in children (<18 years) undergoing elective ambulatory anesthesia.
- To identify key predictors of PRAEs from anesthesia induction through postanesthesia care unit discharge.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a quality improvement database of 19,059 pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory anesthesia.
- Development and validation using split sampling, logistic regression, and risk score calculation.
- Predictor variables included age, sex, ASA status, obesity, pulmonary/neurologic disorders, and procedure type (surgery vs. radiology).
Main Results:
- The overall incidence of composite PRAE was 2.8%.
- Significant predictors of PRAE were: age ≤ 3 years, ASA physical status II/III, morbid obesity, preexisting pulmonary disorder, and undergoing surgery.
- The risk tool generated a score from 0-11, with a cutoff of 4 identifying high-risk patients. Model C-statistics were 0.64 and 0.63 for derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.
Conclusions:
- A validated risk prediction tool identified five key risk factors for PRAEs in pediatric ambulatory anesthesia.
- The tool allows for individual preoperative risk assessment, enabling targeted interventions to improve patient safety.
Background:
Perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) are the most common cause of serious adverse events in children receiving anesthesia. Our primary aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk prediction tool for the occurrence of PRAE from the onset of anesthesia induction until discharge from the postanesthesia care unit in children younger than 18 years undergoing elective ambulatory anesthesia for surgery and radiology. The incidence of PRAE was studied.
Methods:
We analyzed data from 19,059 patients from our department's quality improvement database. The predictor variables were age, sex, ASA physical status, morbid obesity, preexisting pulmonary disorder, preexisting neurologic disorder, and location of ambulatory anesthesia (surgery or radiology). Composite PRAE was defined as the presence of any 1 of the following events: intraoperative bronchospasm, intraoperative laryngospasm, postoperative apnea, postoperative laryngospasm, postoperative bronchospasm, or postoperative prolonged oxygen requirement. Development and validation of the risk prediction tool for PRAE were performed using a split sampling technique to split the database into 2 independent cohorts based on the year when the patient received ambulatory anesthesia for surgery and radiology using logistic regression. A risk score was developed based on the regression coefficients from the validation tool. The performance of the risk prediction tool was assessed by using tests of discrimination and calibration.
Results:
The overall incidence of composite PRAE was 2.8%. The derivation cohort included 8904 patients, and the validation cohort included 10,155 patients. The risk of PRAE was 3.9% in the development cohort and 1.8% in the validation cohort. Age ≤ 3 years (versus >3 years), ASA physical status II or III (versus ASA physical status I), morbid obesity, preexisting pulmonary disorder, and surgery (versus radiology) significantly predicted the occurrence of PRAE in a multivariable logistic regression model. A risk score in the range of 0 to 3 was assigned to each significant variable in the logistic regression model, and final score for all risk factors ranged from 0 to 11. A cutoff score of 4 was derived from a receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the high-risk category. The model C-statistic and the corresponding SE for the derivation and validation cohort was 0.64 ± 0.01 and 0.63 ± 0.02, respectively. Sensitivity and SE of the risk prediction tool to identify children at risk for PRAE was 77.6 ± 0.02 in the derivation cohort and 76.2 ± 0.03 in the validation cohort.
Conclusions:
The risk tool developed and validated from our study cohort identified 5 risk factors: age ≤ 3 years (versus >3 years), ASA physical status II and III (versus ASA physical status I), morbid obesity, preexisting pulmonary disorder, and surgery (versus radiology) for PRAE. This tool can be used to provide an individual risk score for each patient to predict the risk of PRAE in the preoperative period.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...