Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Right atrial thrombus migration during echocardiography: a case for urgent intervention.

European heart journal·1992
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of single dose cefotaxime plus metronidazole compared with three doses each of cefuroxime plus metronidazole for the prevention of wound infection after colorectal surgery.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·1992
Same author

Stimulation of in vitro steroidogenesis by pituitary hormones in a turtle (Trachemys scripta) within the temperature-sensitive period for sex determination.

Biology of reproduction·1992
Same author

Extradural abscess complicating extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section.

British journal of anaesthesia·1992
Same author

Stimulatory effects of serotonin on maturational gonadotropin release in the Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus.

General and comparative endocrinology·1992
Same author

Advances at the cutting edge.

The New Zealand nursing journal. Kai tiaki·1992

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

11.3K

[Metal implant allergy update].

P Thomas1

  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, München, Deutschland. Peter.Thomas@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift Fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, Und Verwandte Gebiete
|April 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Metal allergy can cause intolerance reactions to implants, necessitating patient-specific diagnosis. Further research is needed for accurate testing and understanding of these reactions to metal implants.

Keywords:
ChromiumCobaltLymphocyte transformation testNickelPatch test

More Related Videos

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
09:08

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

4.3K
Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing
08:43

Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing

Published on: September 4, 2016

18.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

11.3K
Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
09:08

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

4.3K
Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing
08:43

Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing

Published on: September 4, 2016

18.5K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Allergy and Immunology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Metal implants can trigger intolerance reactions, potentially due to underlying metal allergies.
  • Current diagnostic approaches for metal implant intolerance lack standardized protocols.
  • Histology and advanced tests like the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) show promise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline diagnostic strategies for metal implant intolerance.
  • To highlight the role of metal allergy in implant reactions.
  • To discuss current and future diagnostic tools.

Main Methods:

  • Review of diagnostic workup for metal implant intolerance.
  • Discussion of patch testing with standard metal series (nickel, cobalt, chromium).
  • Evaluation of lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and histology.

Main Results:

  • Standard patch testing is used, but consensus on implant-specific or bone cement test series is lacking.
  • Combining diagnostic tools, including histology, improves diagnostic accuracy.
  • Lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) requires experienced laboratories and careful interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Metal allergy is a significant factor in implant intolerance.
  • A comprehensive diagnostic approach combining various tools is essential.
  • Further research into pathomechanisms and biomarkers for metal implant intolerance is expected.