Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

An In vitro System to Gauge the Thrombolytic Efficacy of Histotripsy and a Lytic Drug
Published on: June 4, 2021
Thermal Changes during Rheolytic Mechanical Thrombectomy
Michael C Hsu1, Charles N Weber1, Mustafa A Mohammed2
1Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, G.J.N.), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Purpose:
To characterize thermal changes induced by rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) within an ex vivo venous model and evaluate resultant changes of endothelial and vessel wall injury.
Materials And Methods:
Patent human saphenous vein segments without thrombus were mounted in an ex vivo perfusion system with a temperature probe apposed to the adventitial surface. RT was performed over a guide wire to facilitate device centering. Continuous RT was performed for 4 minutes with temperature recorded every 10 seconds. Pulsed RT was performed for eight cycles of 30 seconds followed by 10 seconds of deactivation. Mean temperature increase, maximum temperature (Tmax), intimal/medial thickness, endothelial cell staining (CD31), and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) expression were compared between untreated and RT-treated venous segments.
Results:
Continuous RT produced a mean 7.6°C increase in temperature above baseline with mean Tmax of 44.1°C. Pulsed RT produced a mean 7.3°C increase in temperature and mean Tmax of 43.8°C. Differences in mean temperature increase (P = .66) and Tmax (P = .71) between the two groups were not statistically significant. RT-treated segments showed intima/media thinning (0.32 mm before RT and 0.18 mm after RT; P = .004) and reduction in intact endothelium (38.8% before RT and 13.8% after RT; P = .002). Staining for HSP90 showed a 3.1% increase in expression after RT (P = .31).
Conclusions:
RT in this venous model showed reproducible increases in vessel temperature and evidence of endothelial and vessel wall injury. Avoiding prolonged RT application to a focal vascular segment during clinical use may be beneficial.

