Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

11.0K
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with...
11.0K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

621
The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
621
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

1.5K
Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and...
1.5K
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion01:30

Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion

1.1K
Respiratory system abnormalities are a significant concern in healthcare due to their potential to indicate underlying severe conditions like Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), asthma, and pneumonia. These abnormalities can often be detected through physical examination methods like inspection and percussion.
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...
1.1K
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

9.4K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
9.4K
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation01:31

Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation

1.9K
In assessing respiratory abnormalities, palpation and auscultation are critical tools for detecting and interpreting various pathophysiological changes. These techniques provide insight into underlying disorders by evaluating tactile sensations and sounds produced by the respiratory system.
Palpation Findings
During a respiratory assessment, palpation can reveal several vital abnormalities:
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fostering conversation and co-regulation: how medical students experience co-creating narrative feedback.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

CBME As a Philosophy of Training: Balancing Fidelity and Flexibility in Emergency Medicine.

AEM education and training·2026
Same author

Iterative development of a pediatric point-of-care ultrasound training program.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Challenges in Pediatric Dermatologic Presentations Among Pediatricians.

Pediatric dermatology·2026
Same author

Measuring Facial Appearance in GLP-1 Agonist Use with the FACE-Q Aesthetics Item Library.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026
Same author

Developing Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures for Internal Medicine.

JAMA network open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

18.5K

Interpretation difficulty of normal versus abnormal radiographs using a pediatric example.

Kathy Boutis1, Stefan Cano2, Martin Pecaric3

  • 1The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto.

Canadian Medical Education Journal
|April 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Interpreting pediatric ankle radiographs reveals abnormal cases are more difficult than normal ones, though normal images present varied challenges. Including normal radiographs in training can benefit learners.

More Related Videos

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
15:18

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure

Published on: July 30, 2009

18.8K
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

376

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

18.5K
Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
15:18

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure

Published on: July 30, 2009

18.8K
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

376

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Education
  • Pediatric Imaging

Background:

  • Radiograph teaching files predominantly feature abnormal cases.
  • This implies normal radiographs are perceived as easier to interpret.
  • This study investigates the interpretation difficulty of normal versus abnormal pediatric radiographs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the interpretation difficulty between normal and abnormal pediatric ankle radiographs.
  • To identify factors influencing the difficulty of interpreting normal radiographs.

Main Methods:

  • A digital case bank of 234 pediatric ankle radiographs was created.
  • 139 participants rated cases, classifying them as normal or abnormal.
  • Rasch Measurement Theory was used to determine and contrast interpretation difficulty.

Main Results:

  • Abnormal radiographs were significantly more difficult to interpret (1.57 logits) than normal ones.
  • A considerable overlap in difficulty scores existed between normal and abnormal cases.
  • Younger patient age, distal fibular tenderness, and secondary ossification centers increased normal radiograph difficulty.

Conclusions:

  • Abnormal pediatric radiographs are generally harder to interpret than normal ones.
  • Normal radiographs exhibit a spectrum of interpretation difficulty.
  • Incorporating a substantial number of normal cases into training curricula may enhance learning outcomes.