Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

The Caco-2 Cell Bioassay for Measurement of Food Iron Bioavailability
Published on: April 28, 2022
A meta-analysis to correlate lead bioavailability and bioaccessibility and predict lead bioavailability
Zhaomin Dong1, Kaihong Yan1, Yanju Liu1
1Global Center for Environmental Research (GCER), The Faculty of Science and Information Technology, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.
Predicting lead (Pb) relative bioavailability (RBA) from in vitro bioaccessibility (BAc) data is crucial for contaminated site clean-up. This study developed a reliable in vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC) model to estimate Pb RBA across different soil types.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Toxicology
- Biogeochemistry
Background:
- Accurate assessment of lead (Pb) relative bioavailability (RBA) is essential for effective remediation of contaminated sites.
- In vivo RBA measurements are reliable but labor-intensive, driving interest in high-throughput in vitro bioaccessibility (BAc) predictions.
- Heterogeneity in biomarkers, in vitro methods, and study designs complicates the correlation between in vitro BAc and in vivo RBA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust in vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC) model for predicting lead (Pb) relative bioavailability (RBA) using in vitro bioaccessibility (BAc) data.
- To address and minimize heterogeneities arising from various biomarkers and in vitro approaches in existing studies.
- To estimate Pb RBA across different environmental matrices, including residential land, house dust, and mining/smelting soils.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was conducted, compiling 252 paired RBA-BAc data points from nine publications.
- A Bayesian hierarchical model was employed to account for random effects and minimize study-specific variations.
- A generic linear model was established to represent the IVIVC: RBA (%) = (0.87±0.16) × BAc + (4.70±2.47).
Main Results:
- A significant IVIVC model was identified, demonstrating a strong correlation between Pb RBA and BAc.
- Differences in IVIVCs were significant across various in vitro approaches but relatively minor among different biomarkers.
- The overall estimated Pb RBA was 0.49±0.25, with higher RBA observed in residential land (0.58±0.19) compared to house dust (0.46±0.20) and mining/smelting soils (0.45±0.31).
Conclusions:
- The developed IVIVC model provides a reliable method for predicting Pb RBA from in vitro BAc data, aiding in site-specific risk assessment.
- The findings highlight the importance of considering soil type when estimating Pb RBA, with residential land showing the highest bioavailability.
- This meta-analysis offers a novel approach to correlating Pb RBA and BAc and estimating Pb RBA in diverse environmental contexts.
More Related Videos
14:54An In Vivo Method for Evaluating the Gut-Blood Barrier and Liver Metabolism of Microbiota Products
Published on: October 20, 2018
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems
Bioavailability: Influencing Factors