Retrograde stenting of proximal lesions with carotid endarterectomy increases risk

Concomitant carotid bifurcation and proximal ipsilateral arch branch disease is uncommon. A combined approach using carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with ipsilateral proximal endovascular (IPE) intervention (CEA+IPE) has been proposed as safe and durable, with similar results to isolated CEA. This study was conducted to identify diagnostic modalities and outcomes of this uncommon procedure at our institution.

Operative records were used to identify patients who underwent CEA+IPE between May 2003 and July 2014. Patients were excluded if they underwent open retrograde access for endovascular intervention only, without CEA. The primary end points were freedom from neurologic event and need for reintervention.

Twenty-three patients (15 women [65%]) underwent CEA+IPE. Mean clinical follow-up was 44 ± 35 months. Average age was 69 ± 9 years. Most patients (22 [96%]) were taking a statin and at least one antiplatelet agent. Bilateral internal carotid stenosis (>50%) was present in 12 patients (52%), and eight (35%) were symptomatic. Seven patients (30%) had prior ipsilateral CEA. All patients underwent preoperative carotid duplex and axial imaging. Computed tomography angiography was the initial imaging assessment in 10 patients (43%). The proximal lesion was identified in 19 (83%) by blunted waveforms on carotid duplex. Most bifurcation operations were CEA with patch (20 [87%]), and 21 (91%) underwent the bifurcation procedure first, followed by IPE. All IPE included balloon-expandable stenting (22 of 23 [96%] bare-metal, 7 [30%] innominate artery, 16 [70%] left common carotid artery). Electroencephalographic changes occurred in two patients (9%). Shunting was used in three (13%). Three vessel dissections (13%) occurred at the IPE site; two required further stenting and one was complicated by stroke and death. There were two perioperative strokes (9%) and one death (4%). Mean imaging follow-up was 30.6. ± 27.2 months, with restenosis identified in five patients (23%; four bifurcation, one IPE in-stent). One patient required open reintervention with subclavian-carotid bypass at 13 months for recurrent transient ischemic attack. The 4-year actuarial survival was 85%. Stroke-free survival and freedom from reintervention were 80% and 90% at 36 months, respectively.

The stroke and death rate for CEA+IPE is higher than that of isolated CEA at our institution. Duplex findings can suggest proximal stenosis; however, confirmation with physical examination in conjunction with axial imaging are integral. This combined treatment strategy should be reserved for those with evident hemodynamically significant proximal stenosis and approached with caution in asymptomatic patients.