Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Capsular Serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae by Latex Agglutination
Published on: September 25, 2014
lytA-based identification methods can misidentify Streptococcus pneumoniae
Alexandra S Simões1, Débora A Tavares1, Dora Rolo2
1Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology of Human Pathogens, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (ITQB), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Oeiras, Portugal.
Abstract:
During surveillance studies we detected, among over 1500 presumptive pneumococci, 11 isolates displaying conflicting or novel results when characterized by widely accepted phenotypic (optochin susceptibility and bile solubility) and genotypic (lytA-BsaAI-RFLP and MLST) identification methods. We aimed to determine the genetic basis for the unexpected results given by lytA-BsaAI-RFLP and investigate the accuracy of the WHO recommended lytA real-time PCR assay to classify these 11 isolates. Three novel lytA-BsaAI-RFLP signatures were found (one in pneumococcus and two in S. mitis). In addition, one pneumococcus displayed the atypical lytA-BsaAI-RFLP signature characteristic of non-pneumococci and two S. pseudopneumoniae displayed the typical lytA-BsaAI-RFLP pattern characteristic of pneumococci. lytA real-time PCR misidentified these three isolates. In conclusion, identification of pneumococci by lytA real-time PCR, and other lytA-based methodologies, may lead to false results. This is of particular relevance in the increasingly frequent colonization studies relying solely on culture-independent methods.
Insights
Novel genetic signatures challenge Streptococcus pneumoniae identification. Standard lytA real-time PCR assays may misidentify pneumococci, impacting colonization studies.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Bacterial Identification
Background:
- Accurate identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae is crucial for epidemiological surveillance and clinical management.
- Widely accepted phenotypic and genotypic methods are used for pneumococcal identification.
- Surveillance studies identified isolates with conflicting results using standard methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the genetic basis for unexpected results from lytA-BsaAI-RFLP.
- To evaluate the accuracy of the WHO-recommended lytA real-time PCR assay for classifying challenging isolates.
Main Methods:
- Phenotypic characterization (optochin susceptibility, bile solubility).
- Genotypic characterization (lytA-BsaAI-RFLP, MLST).
- Real-time PCR targeting the lytA gene.
Main Results:
- Three novel lytA-BsaAI-RFLP signatures were identified in *S. pneumoniae* and *S. mitis*.
- Misidentification occurred for one *S. pneumoniae* and two *S. pseudopneumoniae* isolates using lytA-based methods.
- The lytA real-time PCR assay misclassified three of the eleven challenging isolates.
Conclusions:
- Identification of *S. pneumoniae* using lytA-based methodologies, including real-time PCR, can lead to false results.
- The findings have significant implications for colonization studies relying on culture-independent methods.
- Re-evaluation of diagnostic strategies for pneumococcal identification is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Classification and Identification
Atypical Pneumonia
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Bacterial Phylum Spirochaetes

