Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

09:30
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
20.2K
7 Tesla quantitative hip MRI: a comparison between TESS and CPMG for T2 mapping
Oliver Kraff1, Andrea Lazik-Palm2,3, Rahel Heule4,5
1Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Kokereiallee 7, Building C84, 45141, Essen, Germany. oliver.kraff@uni-due.de.
Magma (New York, N.Y.)
|April 27, 2016
Summary
Triple-echo steady state (TESS) T2 mapping is a feasible alternative for quantitative hip joint cartilage imaging at 7T. This method offers faster acquisition and B1 insensitivity compared to conventional multi-echo-spin-echo (CPMG) T2 mapping.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Quantitative Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Quantitative assessment of hip joint cartilage is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring joint diseases.
- Conventional multi-echo-spin-echo (CPMG) T2 mapping is established but can be time-consuming and sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities.
- Advancements in MRI techniques are needed to improve efficiency and robustness in cartilage imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of triple-echo steady state (TESS) T2 mapping as an alternative to CPMG T2 mapping.
- To compare the quantitative accuracy, reproducibility, and image quality of TESS and CPMG T2 mapping for hip joint cartilage at 7 Tesla (7T).
Main Methods:
- TESS and CPMG T2 mapping were performed on eight healthy volunteers and three patients at 7T.
- Reproducibility was assessed in five volunteers over five scans.
- T2 relaxation times were measured in multiple hip joint regions, and data were compared using correlation coefficients and repeatability measures. Image quality and artifacts were also evaluated.
Main Results:
- Both TESS and CPMG depicted cartilage and fluid well.
- TESS yielded systematically lower T2 values compared to CPMG for both acetabular and femoral cartilage.
- No correlation was found between the two methods; TESS showed slightly better reproducibility and was insensitive to B1 inhomogeneities, unlike CPMG.
Conclusions:
- TESS T2 mapping is a promising alternative for quantitative hip joint imaging at 7T.
- It allows for reduced acquisition time and improved insensitivity to B1 inhomogeneities.
- TESS offers comparable image quality and good repeatability, making it attractive for clinical applications.

