Comparative analysis of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal aortic replacement for aneurysm

Transabdominal aortic replacement is the most widely accepted surgical approach in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with an enviable mortality rate of 2 to 5 per cent. This approach, however, is attended by significant intraoperative loss of fluid and subsequent translocation as well as impaired postoperative pulmonary function and ileus. Although the retroperitoneal exposure of the aorta was used for the first repair of an AAA by Dubost and has been championed more recently by others, it has not been widely accepted. Experience suggests, however, that the exposure is as good and that postoperative morbidity is significantly less than that with the transperitoneal approach. In the past five years, we have surgically treated 299 AAA, 106 by the transabdominal route and 193 by the extended retroperitoneal approach. In 133 of the 193 patients upon whom the retroperitoneal approach was used, the aneurysm was left intact after division of the infrarenal aorta for an end to end proximal anastomosis of an aortoaortic to iliac to femoral bypass. There has been a significant reduction in the intraoperative replacement of fluid and blood, in postoperative respiratory support, in length of time in the intensive care unit and in occurrence of postoperative ileus when compared with the transabdominal endoaneurysmorrhaphy approach. Furthermore, the exposure, particularly upon the obese patient, is superior. Findings from this experience using the retroperitoneal approach for repair of AAA indicate that it results in less over-all physiologic disturbance of the patient.