Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

10:35
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
18.8K
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Poor Performance Status Patients
Gregory J Kubicek1, Alan Turtz2, Jinyu Xue1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey.
Summary
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a viable treatment for patients with poor performance status (PS) and central nervous system (CNS) metastases, demonstrating reasonable survival and low failure rates. This approach may be preferable to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for select patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Patients with poor performance status (PS), defined as Karnofsky Performance Status ≤60, are often excluded from stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) trials.
- Current guidelines frequently recommend whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as the primary treatment for this patient group.
- Limited data exists on the efficacy and safety of SRS in patients with poor PS and central nervous system (CNS) metastases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with poor performance status (PS) and central nervous system (CNS) metastatic disease.
- To compare SRS outcomes in this population with historical data or expectations for whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of a stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) database.
- Inclusion of 36 patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 60 or less treated with SRS for CNS metastases.
- Analysis of overall survival (OS), local and distant failure rates, and treatment toxicity.
Main Results:
- Median overall survival (OS) was 7.2 months; 41% survived at 6 months and 16.6% at 1 year.
- No significant difference in OS was observed in patients with prior WBRT.
- No local failures or radiation toxicity were reported; distant CNS failures occurred in 25% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Patients with poor performance status (PS) treated with SRS for CNS metastases demonstrated reasonable median OS and low distant CNS failure rates.
- SRS may be a favorable alternative to WBRT for poor PS patients due to low failure rates and convenient single-fraction treatment.
- The findings suggest SRS is a safe and effective option for select debilitated patients with CNS metastases.

