Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

11:51
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
15.8K
Potential follow-up increases private contributions to public goods
Todd Rogers1, John Ternovski2, Erez Yoeli3
1Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Todd_Rogers@hks.harvard.edu.
Summary
Making contributions to public goods more observable increases participation. A simple message about potential follow-up calls significantly boosted voter turnout in a large field experiment, enhancing public goods contributions.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Political Science
Background:
- Individuals are more likely to contribute to public goods when their actions are observable.
- Private and impersonal solicitations (e.g., mail, email) often lack mechanisms to increase contribution observability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test an intervention that subtly increases the observability of public goods contributions in private solicitations.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of perceived observability on voter turnout.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale field experiment with 770,946 participants was conducted.
- Participants received get-out-the-vote letters with a variation: some included a message about a potential post-election call to inquire about their voting experience.
- This message aimed to increase the perceived observability of voting behavior.
Main Results:
- The intervention, which increased perceived observability, significantly enhanced the impact of the get-out-the-vote letters.
- The effect of this observability intervention surpassed the impact of a typical get-out-the-vote letter.
- This demonstrates a powerful method for increasing public goods contributions.
Conclusions:
- Subtly increasing the perceived observability of contributions is a highly effective strategy for promoting public goods provision.
- This technique can be widely applied to various private solicitation contexts, such as charitable giving and civic engagement.
- The findings have significant implications for designing more effective public policy interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Egoism and Altruism
94.2K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
94.2K
Altruism
48.7K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
48.7K
Social Loafing
39.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.8K
Social Traps
27.0K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
27.0K
Inclusive Fitness
43.6K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
43.6K
Fundamental Attribution Error
14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K
