Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
Running Energy Cost and Spring-Mass Behavior in Young versus Older Trained Athletes
Patrícia Dias Pantoja1, Jean Benoit Morin, Leonardo Alexandre Peyré-Tartaruga
11Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, BRAZIL; 2Laboratory of Human Motricity, Expertise Sport and Health, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, University of Cote d'Azure, Nice, FRANCE; and 3School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA.
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to compare energy cost of running and lower limb spring-mass characteristics and maximal power between young and older highly trained runners.
Methods:
Twenty highly trained male endurance runners were divided into two groups: young and master athletes. Two testing sessions were used to measure and compare (i) lower limb power during three jumping tests (squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and rebound jump (RJ)) as well as stiffness during the RJ test and running trials (using an OptoJump system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) placed on the floor for jumping and on each side of the treadmill belt for running), and (ii) the energy cost of running and oxygen consumption (V˙O2) kinetics (using an Oxycon Pro breath-by-breath gas analyzer (Jaeger, Höchberg, Germany)) at three speeds: 10 km·h, self-selected speed, and speed corresponding to 90% of the second ventilatory threshold (VT2).
Results:
Energy cost of running was higher in masters than in young athletes at all speeds (10 km·h, 13.0%; self-selected, 10.8%; 90% VT2, 7.7% on average). Jumping power was lower in masters (SJ, -28.0%; CMJ, -30.5%; RJ, -27.9%) and significantly correlated with energy cost at 10 km·h and at self-selected speed (10 km·h: r = -0.71, -0.70, -0.47; self-selected speed: r = -0.76, -0.74, -0.58, respectively). RJ stiffness was also lower in masters (-27.8%), although stiffness during running showed no difference between groups.
Conclusions:
A long-lasting running practice seemed to preserve the bouncing mechanism of master athletes, yet their energy cost was higher when compared with younger runners, which might have been associated with a lower muscle power.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Frequency of Spring-Mass System
Consider a block on a spring on a frictionless surface. There...
Work and Energy for Variable Forces
Metabolic Rate
The Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) measures the energy expended at rest.
Several factors influence...
Energy in Simple Harmonic Motion
Energy Budgets

