Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010-2050.

Nature food·2023

Same author

Radiometals from liquid targets: 94mTc production using a standard water target on a 13 MeV cyclotron.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2012

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Evaluating a physician leadership development program - a mixed methods approach.

Cheryl Throgmorton¹, Trey Mitchell², Tom Morley²

¹Talent Development, Mercy, Chesterfield, Missouri, US.

Journal of Health Organization and Management

|April 28, 2016

Summary

This study evaluated a Physician Leadership Academy (PLA), finding it successfully enhanced physician leadership skills, self-awareness, and confidence. The program demonstrated positive outcomes across all evaluation levels, highlighting the value of targeted leadership development.

Keywords:

Cohort Healthcare Interview Kirkpatrick ROI Relationships

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

Healthcare Management
Medical Education
Organizational Development

Background:

Healthcare organizations require strong physician leaders amidst significant industry changes.
A gap exists in formal physician leadership education, prompting the development of specialized programs.
Physician Leadership Academies (PLAs) are emerging as a solution for leadership development in healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline the evaluation strategy and outcomes of a newly implemented Physician Leadership Academy (PLA).
To assess the effectiveness of an in-house leadership program tailored for physicians.
To provide insights into the impact of physician leadership development on individuals and the organization.

Main Methods:

Utilized Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation as a theoretical framework.
Employed surveys, observations, activity tracking, and interviews for data collection.
Applied grounded theory techniques to analyze qualitative interview data.

Main Results:

The Physician Leadership Academy (PLA) successfully met its targeted outcomes across all four evaluation levels.
Key themes from interviews included increased self-awareness, improved relationship building, skill application, and enhanced confidence.
The program demonstrated positive impacts on physician learning, engagement, and inter-professional relationships.

Conclusions:

Developing a robust evaluation strategy is integral to the design of leadership programs.
Qualitative research methods uncover rich insights into the impact of leadership development.
Physician leadership programs, when developed in partnership with learning professionals, yield significant organizational benefits.