Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

789
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
789
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview01:03

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

5.7K
Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
5.7K
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic01:21

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

221
The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response...
221
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

10.5K
Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
10.5K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

373
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
373

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Clinical Benefit to Economic Value: A Scoping Review of Machine Perfusion in Solid-organ Transplantation.

Transplantation·2026
Same author

Fit for purpose? Assessing the robustness of discrete choice experiment designs in the context of evolving health technologies.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same author

Validating and updating the OHTS-EGPS model predicting 5-year glaucoma risk among patients with ocular hypertension using electronic medical records: a cohort study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Stated Preferences for Systemic Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Targeted Review of the Discrete-Choice Experiment Literature.

The patient·2026
Same author

Public health economics and upstream income-based policies: from cost to value.

Journal of public health policy·2025
Same author

'Get away from it all' or 'Too good to be true?': a qualitative exploration of job advertisements for remote and rural posts.

Rural and remote health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K

Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta-analysis.

Verity Watson1, Frauke Becker2, Esther de Bekker-Grob3

  • 1Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Health Economics
|April 29, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are vital for health research but face low response rates. Study design elements like cognitive burden and relevance significantly impact participation, according to this meta-regression analysis.

Keywords:
discrete choice experimentsmeta regression analysisresponse ratessurvey design

More Related Videos

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.3K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.3K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Survey Methodology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) are widely used for eliciting preferences in health and healthcare.
  • DCEs are susceptible to various survey errors, including non-response, which can bias results.
  • Limited research exists specifically on factors influencing DCE response rates.

Discussion:

  • This meta-regression analysis examines how study design characteristics affect DCE survey response rates.
  • The study is theoretically grounded in social exchange theory, viewing survey participation as a cost-benefit decision for respondents.
  • Key design elements investigated include cognitive burden and perceived relevance of the survey to participants.

Key Insights:

  • DCE response rates are significantly influenced by the cognitive burden imposed on participants.
  • Surveys perceived as more relevant to the surveyed population tend to achieve higher response rates.
  • These findings highlight the importance of optimizing DCE design to improve data quality and reduce non-response bias.

Outlook:

  • Future DCE research should prioritize minimizing cognitive load and maximizing participant relevance.
  • Developing best practices for DCE design can enhance the reliability and validity of preference elicitation.
  • Further investigation into social exchange theory's application in survey methodology could yield valuable insights.