Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

GTPases and their Regulation02:14

GTPases and their Regulation

10.3K
Guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins), also known as GTPases, are a superfamily of proteins that regulate many cellular processes, such as cell signaling, vesicular transport, and the regulation of cell shape and motility. Mutation or dysfunction of these proteins can lead to disease. There are around 40,000 known G-proteins that can broadly be classified into two groups ‒  small G-proteins consisting of a single domain and large multi-domain G-proteins.
Large G-proteins,...
10.3K
GTPases and their Regulation02:14

GTPases and their Regulation

3.2K
3.2K
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho01:24

Small GTPases - Ras and Rho

5.7K
Ras and Rho are small monomeric GTPases that act downstream of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and regulate various cellular processes. These GTPases switch between active and inactive states by binding to guanine nucleotides.
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
5.7K
Activation and Inactivation of G Proteins01:22

Activation and Inactivation of G Proteins

12.3K
Heterotrimeric G proteins are guanine nucleotide-binding proteins. As the name suggests, heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of three subunits: alpha, beta, and gamma. They remain GDP-bound or GTP-bound inside the cells and switch between inactive/active states. The Gα subunit possesses the nucleotide-binding pocket that binds guanine nucleotides and switches between GDP or GTP-bound states. In contrast, the Gꞵ and Gγ subunits are always bound together with high...
12.3K
Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade01:22

Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade

19.1K
When a ligand binds to a cell-surface receptor, the receptor's intracellular domain changes shape, which may either activate its enzyme function or allow its binding to other molecules. The initial signal is amplified by most signal transduction pathways. This means that a single ligand molecule can activate multiple molecules of a downstream target. Proteins that relay a signal are most commonly phosphorylated at one or more sites, activating or inactivating the protein. Kinases catalyze...
19.1K
Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

7.0K
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An adaptable, self-organizing, single-cell morphology circuit optimizes suctorian predatory trap structure.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Noise-Guided Design of Synthetic Protein Waves in Living Cells.

ACS synthetic biology·2025
Same author

A self-organizing single-cell morphology circuit optimizes <i>Podophrya collini</i> predatory trap structure.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Decoding ultrasensitive self-assembly of the calcium-regulated Tetrahymena cytoskeletal protein Tcb2 using optical actuation.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2025
Same author

Decoding ultrasensitive self-assembly of the calcium-regulated <i>Tetrahymena</i> cytoskeletal protein Tcb2 using optical actuation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Noise-guided tuning of synthetic protein waves in living cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

The role of RAC1 in resistance to targeted therapies in cancer.

Small GTPases·2025
Same journal

The structure of KRAS<sup>G12C</sup> bound to divarasib highlights features of potent switch-II pocket engagement.

Small GTPases·2025
Same journal

Small GTPase Rac promotes hyphal formation and microconidiogenesis in <i>Trichophyton rubrum</i>.

Small GTPases·2025
Same journal

To stay in shape and keep moving: MLL emerges as a new transcriptional regulator of Rho GTPases.

Small GTPases·2023
Same journal

Serine phosphorylation of the RhoGEF Trio stabilizes endothelial cell-cell junctions.

Small GTPases·2023
Same journal

Rab6-mediated retrograde trafficking from the Golgi: the trouble with tubules.

Small GTPases·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

9.7K

Reverse engineering GTPase programming languages with reconstituted signaling networks.

Scott M Coyle1

  • 1a Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology , University of California , San Francisco , CA , USA.

Small Gtpases
|April 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed a novel assay to observe Ras GTPase signaling networks in action. This system allows studying how these molecular switches control cellular processes and disease, advancing our understanding of complex biological systems.

Keywords:
Rasbiochemistrydynamicsin vitro reconstitutionsignaling

More Related Videos

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding
10:13

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding

Published on: June 9, 2017

17.4K
Detection of Small GTPase Prenylation and GTP Binding Using Membrane Fractionation and GTPase-linked Immunosorbent Assay
13:51

Detection of Small GTPase Prenylation and GTP Binding Using Membrane Fractionation and GTPase-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Published on: November 11, 2018

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

9.7K
Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding
10:13

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding

Published on: June 9, 2017

17.4K
Detection of Small GTPase Prenylation and GTP Binding Using Membrane Fractionation and GTPase-linked Immunosorbent Assay
13:51

Detection of Small GTPase Prenylation and GTP Binding Using Membrane Fractionation and GTPase-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Published on: November 11, 2018

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular Signaling
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Ras superfamily GTPases are crucial regulators of eukaryotic cellular processes.
  • Decades of research have elucidated individual GTPase functions but understanding network dynamics remains a challenge.
  • Decoding GTPase network 'programming' is key to understanding cellular diversity and disease mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel bead-based microscopy assay for observing reconstituted H-Ras signaling systems.
  • To highlight key observations and insights from this new assay.
  • To propose extensions for studying GTPase signaling networks.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a bead-based microscopy assay.
  • Reconstitution of H-Ras signaling systems with varying regulator and effector configurations.
  • Observation of dynamic signaling outcomes in real-time.

Main Results:

  • The assay enables visualization of H-Ras signaling dynamics under defined conditions.
  • Key observations provide insights into how GTPase networks achieve complex signaling outcomes.
  • The study demonstrates the utility of the assay for dissecting GTPase network function.

Conclusions:

  • The developed assay is a powerful tool for studying GTPase signaling systems.
  • Further extensions of this method will enhance our understanding of GTPase networks in health and disease.
  • This approach offers new avenues for investigating how evolution has utilized GTPase machinery across different species and cell types.