Under sevoflurane anaesthesia, a reduced dose of neostigmine can antagonize a shallow neuromuscular block: A double-blind, randomised study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Translational Applications of Stimulated SFEMG in Rodent Models
Published on: March 8, 2024
Alice Preault1, Florent Capron2, Céline Chantereau3
1Département d'anesthésie, centre hospitalier départemental de La Roche-sur-Yon, Les Oudairies, 85000 La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
Background:
It has been demonstrated that small doses of neostigmine (10-30μg.kg(-1)) effectively antagonize atracurium blocks at a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.4 under propofol anaesthesia. The results might not be valid with halogenated agents, which potentiate neuromuscular blockades. The goal of this study was to determine the dose of neostigmine required to antagonize a block corresponding to a TOF ratio of 0.4, a level at which fade is not visually detected.
Methods:
Sixty patients were included and anaesthesia was induced with propofol, remifentanil and cisatracurium, and maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil. Patients were randomized to receive neostigmine at 40, 20, 10μg.kg(-1) or placebo with atropine (20, 10, 5 or 0μg.kg(-1), respectively) as soon as the TOF ratio reached 0.4. Elapsed times to 0.9 and 1.0 TOF ratios were measured.
Results:
The median times elapsed from 0.4 to 0.9 and 1.0 TOF ratios in the placebo group were 19 (10.5-36) min and 26 (20-50) min, respectively, and significantly shorter (I=0.002) with any dose of neostigmine than without. Times for complete recovery after 40 and 20μg.kg(-1) neostigmine were similar [5.5 (4-11) min and 7.8 (3.5-11) min, respectively] but significantly shorter than after 10μg.kg(-1) neostigmine [17min (7-55); I=0.001].
Conclusion:
Under sevoflurane anaesthesia, in absence of tactile or visual TOF fade, which corresponds to a TOF ratio≥0.4, 20μg.kg(-1) neostigmine is as effective as 40μg.kg(-1) in antagonizing shallow cisatracurium block.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...

