Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

09:30
Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022
3.6K
Noninvasive prenatal screening or advanced diagnostic testing: caveat emptor.
Mark I Evans1, Ronald J Wapner2, Richard L Berkowitz2
1Comprehensive Genetics PLLC and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, NY; Mt Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|May 2, 2016
Summary
New prenatal screening using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is highly accurate for common aneuploidies. However, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) reveals significant, clinically relevant genetic variations missed by standard screening.
Area of Science:
- Prenatal Genetics
- Reproductive Medicine
- Genomic Medicine
Background:
- Recent advances include next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and microarray analysis for enhanced cytogenetic resolution.
- NIPS demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, leading to reduced invasive diagnostic procedures like chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis.
- A decrease in patient counseling has been observed alongside the rise of NIPS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare karyotype with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for detecting chromosomal abnormalities.
- To evaluate the clinical relevance of copy number variants (CNVs) identified by aCGH in pregnancies with normal karyotypes.
- To advocate for comprehensive genetic counseling and diagnostic testing for all pregnant individuals.
Main Methods:
- A blinded comparison study funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- Utilized karyotype analysis and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).
- Analyzed samples from patients with normal karyotypes, ultrasound-detected anomalies, and normal scans.
Main Results:
- In patients with a normal karyotype, aCGH identified clinically relevant microdeletions or duplications in 2.5% of cases.
- Incremental findings were observed in 6% of pregnancies with ultrasound-detected structural anomalies and 1.6% of those with normal scans.
- The risk of a pathogenic CNV in patients with a normal ultrasound and karyotype is over 1%, exceeding the age-related risk for aneuploidy in a 38-year-old.
Conclusions:
- Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) detects significant genetic variations missed by standard prenatal screening and karyotyping.
- The risk of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) warrants offering diagnostic testing to all patients, irrespective of age or ultrasound findings.
- Enhanced genetic counseling is crucial to inform patients about the risks and benefits of advanced prenatal genetic testing options.

