Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Administration of low molecular weight and unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention
Sadegh Ali-Hassan-Sayegh1, Seyed Jalil Mirhosseini1, Azadeh Shahidzadeh1
1Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Insights
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is more effective and safer than unfractionated heparin (UFH) for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). LMWH improves myocardial perfusion and reduces re-infarction, bleeding, and mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure for managing coronary artery disease.
- Heparin anticoagulation is crucial during PCI, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) being the primary agents.
- Comparative efficacy and safety data between UFH and LMWH in PCI settings require ongoing evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of UFH versus LMWH in patients undergoing PCI.
- To assess the impact of LMWH and UFH on key clinical outcomes, including myocardial perfusion, re-infarction, stroke, bleeding, and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Literature search across major databases (Medline, Embase, Elsevier, Web of Knowledge) and Google Scholar.
- Inclusion of 23 trials with 43,912 patients comparing UFH and LMWH in PCI.
Main Results:
- LMWH significantly increased thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow compared to UFH (p<0.001).
- LMWH demonstrated significantly lower rates of re-myocardial infarction (p<0.001), major bleeding (p=0.02), and mortality (p<0.001).
- No significant differences were observed in target vessel revascularization (p=0.6) or stroke incidence (p=0.7).
Conclusions:
- LMWH is a preferred anticoagulant over UFH for patients with myocardial infarction undergoing PCI.
- LMWH offers superior efficacy, evidenced by improved myocardial perfusion and reduced re-infarction.
- LMWH is associated with a better safety profile, including decreased major bleeding and mortality.
Abstract:
This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the efficacy and safety of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. Medline, Embase, Elsevier, and web of knowledge as well as Google scholar literature were used for selecting appropriate studies with randomized controlled design. After screening 445 studies, a total of 23 trials (including a total of 43,912 patients) were identified that reported outcomes. Pooled analysis revealed that LMWH compared to UFH could significantly increase thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow (p<0.001), which was associated with similar target vessel revascularization (p=0.6), similar incidence of stroke (p=0.7), and significantly lower incidence of re-myocardial infarction (p<0.001), major bleeding (p=0.02) and mortality (p<0.001). Overall, LMWH was shown to be a useful type of heparin for patients with MI undergoing PCI, due to its higher efficacy and lower rate of complication compared to UFH. It is also associated with increased myocardial perfusion, decreased major hemorrhage, and mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

