Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction of Patients with Perforation Peritonitis
Murugappan Nachiappan1, Manjusha Madhusudhan Litake2
1Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, BJ Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals , Pune, Maharashtra, India .
Introduction:
Peritonitis continues to be one of the major infectious problems confronting a surgeon. Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), Physiological and Operative Severity Score for en Umeration of Mortality (POSSUM) and Morbidity and sepsis score of Stoner and Elebute have been devised for risk assessment and for prediction of postoperative outcome.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to find the accuracy of these scores in predicting outcome in terms of mortality in patients undergoing exploratory laprotomy for perforation peritonitis.
Materials And Methods:
The prospective study was carried out in 100 diagnosed cases of perforation at our centre in a single unit over a period of 21 months from December 2012 to August 2014. Study was conducted on all cases of peritonitis albeit primary, tertiary, iatrogenic and those with age less than 12 years were excluded from the study. All the relevant data were collected and three scores were computed from one set of data from the patient. The main outcome measure was survival of the patient. The Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves were obtained for the three scores. Area Under the Curves (AUC) was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at a cut off point obtained from the ROC curves.
Results:
POSSUM had an AUC of 0.99, sepsis score had an AUC of 0.98 and MPI had an AUC of 0.95. The cut off point score of 51 for POSSUM had an accuracy of 93.8 and positive predictive value of 70.5, the score of 29 for MPI had an accuracy of 82.8 and positive predictive value of 46 and the score of 22 for sepsis score had an accuracy of 95.9 and positive predictive value of 86.67.
Conclusion:
POSSUM score was found to be superior in prediction of mortality as compared to sepsis score of Stoner and Elebute and MPI. POSSUM and MPI over predicted mortality in some cases. None of these scores are strictly preoperative.
Insights
The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for en Umeration of Mortality (POSSUM) score accurately predicts mortality in perforation peritonitis patients. POSSUM demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) and sepsis score.
Area of Science:
- Surgical outcomes research
- Infectious disease epidemiology
- Clinical risk assessment
Background:
- Peritonitis remains a significant surgical infectious challenge.
- Existing risk assessment tools include the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), POSSUM, and the sepsis score.
- Accurate prediction of postoperative outcomes is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of MPI, POSSUM, and the sepsis score in predicting mortality.
- To compare the predictive performance of these scores in patients with perforation peritonitis undergoing exploratory laparotomy.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 100 patients with perforation peritonitis.
- Exclusion of primary, tertiary, iatrogenic peritonitis, and patients under 12 years.
- Calculation of MPI, POSSUM, and sepsis scores; Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curves (AUC) analysis.
Main Results:
- POSSUM achieved the highest AUC (0.99), followed by the sepsis score (0.98) and MPI (0.95).
- POSSUM demonstrated 93.8% accuracy and 70.5% positive predictive value (PPV) at a cutoff of 51.
- The sepsis score showed 95.9% accuracy and 86.67% PPV at a cutoff of 22, while MPI had 82.8% accuracy and 46% PPV at a cutoff of 29.
Conclusions:
- POSSUM is superior to MPI and the sepsis score in predicting mortality in perforation peritonitis.
- POSSUM and MPI tended to overpredict mortality in certain cases.
- None of the evaluated scores are exclusively preoperative.
More Related Videos
09:11Systematic Scoring Analysis for Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis Model
Published on: February 14, 2021
09:00Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
Published on: November 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....