Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Characterizing Mutational Load and Clonal Composition of Human Blood
Published on: July 11, 2019
Quantitative Analysis of Mutant Subclones in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Different Methodological
Sandra Preuner1, Agnes Barna2, Florian Frommlet3
1Children's Cancer Research Institute (CCRI), Zimmermannplatz 10, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. sandra.preuner@ccri.at.
Abstract:
Identification and quantitative monitoring of mutant BCR-ABL1 subclones displaying resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become important tasks in patients with Ph-positive leukemias. Different technologies have been established for patient screening. Various next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms facilitating sensitive detection and quantitative monitoring of mutations in the ABL1-kinase domain (KD) have been introduced recently, and are expected to become the preferred technology in the future. However, broad clinical implementation of NGS methods has been hampered by the limited accessibility at different centers and the current costs of analysis which may not be regarded as readily affordable for routine diagnostic monitoring. It is therefore of interest to determine whether NGS platforms can be adequately substituted by other methodological approaches. We have tested three different techniques including pyrosequencing, LD (ligation-dependent)-PCR and NGS in a series of peripheral blood specimens from chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients carrying single or multiple mutations in the BCR-ABL1 KD. The proliferation kinetics of mutant subclones in serial specimens obtained during the course of TKI-treatment revealed similar profiles via all technical approaches, but individual specimens showed statistically significant differences between NGS and the other methods tested. The observations indicate that different approaches to detection and quantification of mutant subclones may be applicable for the monitoring of clonal kinetics, but careful calibration of each method is required for accurate size assessment of mutant subclones at individual time points.
Insights
Monitoring BCR-ABL1 mutations in leukemia is crucial. While next-generation sequencing (NGS) is promising, pyrosequencing and ligation-dependent PCR offer viable alternatives for tracking resistant subclones, though method calibration is essential.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
Background:
- Monitoring BCR-ABL1 mutations is vital for managing Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias.
- Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard treatment, but resistance via BCR-ABL1 mutations necessitates careful patient monitoring.
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers sensitive detection of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations but faces accessibility and cost barriers for routine use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate alternative methods to NGS for monitoring BCR-ABL1 mutant subclones in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients.
- To compare the efficacy of pyrosequencing, ligation-dependent PCR (LD-PCR), and NGS in detecting and quantifying BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations.
- To assess if alternative methods can substitute NGS for routine monitoring of TKI-resistant subclones.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of peripheral blood specimens from CML patients with known BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations.
- Comparative assessment of three techniques: pyrosequencing, LD-PCR, and NGS.
- Evaluation of proliferation kinetics of mutant subclones over time during TKI treatment.
Main Results:
- All tested methods (pyrosequencing, LD-PCR, NGS) demonstrated similar trends in the proliferation kinetics of BCR-ABL1 mutant subclones.
- Statistically significant differences in individual specimen results were observed between NGS and the other two methods.
- The study confirmed that different detection methods can be used for monitoring clonal kinetics.
Conclusions:
- Pyrosequencing and LD-PCR are potential alternatives to NGS for monitoring BCR-ABL1 mutant subclones in CML patients.
- Accurate assessment of mutant subclone size requires careful calibration of the chosen detection method.
- Standardization and validation of alternative methods are crucial for reliable clinical implementation in TKI therapy monitoring.
More Related Videos
09:01Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
09:57Comprehensive Protocol to Sample and Process Bone Marrow for Measuring Measurable Residual Disease and Leukemic Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: March 5, 2018