Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Synteny and Evolution

Synteny and Evolution

John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.

Phylogeny

Phylogeny

Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic Trees

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evolving view on phylogenetic networks.

Systematic biology·2026

Same author

tanggle: An R package for the visualization of phylogenetic networks.

Applications in plant sciences·2026

Same author

Conditions Enabling the Persistence of Cooperating Synthetase, Ligase, and Mutation-Inhibitor Catalytic Polymers.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026

Same author

SNaQ.jl: Improved scalability for level-1 phylogenetic network inference.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Activity-Informed Network Analysis Reveals Keystone Microbes Shaping Freshwater Ecosystem Function.

Environmental microbiology reports·2026

Same author

Ecological constraints and evolutionary trade-offs shape nitrogen fixation across habitats.

ISME communications·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

Statistical evidence for common ancestry: Application to primates.

David A Baum¹, Cécile Ané^2,3, Bret Larget^2,3

¹Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706. dbaum@wisc.edu.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution

|May 4, 2016

Summary

This study quantifies evidence for common ancestry (CA) in primates using statistical methods. Results overwhelmingly reject separate ancestry (SA) hypotheses, strongly supporting primate CA.

Keywords:

Biogeography fossils permutation tail probability phylogenetic autocorrelation separate ancestry tree agreement

More Related Videos

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Published on: May 14, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Published on: May 14, 2009

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Phylogenetics
Biostatistics

Background:

The theory of descent from common ancestry (CA) is well-supported by qualitative evidence.
Formal methods are needed to quantify the evidential support for CA over separate ancestry (SA).

Purpose of the Study:

To explore statistical methods for quantifying evidential support for CA in primates.
To test species SA and family SA hypotheses against CA.

Main Methods:

Implemented statistical tests using morphological, molecular, and biogeographic data.
Developed new methods for phylogenetic autocorrelation and analysis of fossil taxa.
Focused on primate data to test CA against species and family SA.

Main Results:

Overwhelmingly rejected both species SA and family SA hypotheses with infinitesimal P values.
Found tremendously strong statistical support for the common ancestry of all primates.
Demonstrated the utility of statistical testing for historical hypotheses.

Conclusions:

Statistical quantification strongly supports the common ancestry of primates.
The developed methods provide robust tools for testing evolutionary hypotheses.
Future research should continue to refine statistical approaches in evolutionary biology.