Assessment of skinfold thickness equations in estimating body composition in children with inflammatory bowel disease

Céline Callias1, Jessica Ezri1, Pedro Manuel Marques-Vidal2

  • 1Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Lausanne, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Insights

Skifold thickness equations show good correlation but poor agreement for estimating fat mass in pediatric IBD patients compared to DEXA. These equations are not recommended for assessing body composition in this group.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Body Composition Analysis
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Research

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of body composition, specifically fat mass (FM%), is crucial in managing pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
  • Traditional methods like skinfold thickness equations are commonly used but their accuracy in IBD populations is not well-established.
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is considered a reference standard for body composition analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the agreement between commonly used skinfold thickness equations and DEXA for estimating FM% in pediatric IBD patients.
  • To determine if skinfold equations provide reliable body composition data in this specific clinical population.
  • To compare the performance of six different pediatric skinfold equations against DEXA.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 21 pediatric IBD patients (11 female, 10 male; mean age 14.3 years) diagnosed with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.
  • Calculation of FM% using six established pediatric skinfold thickness equations.
  • Comparison of skinfold-derived FM% with FM% measured by DEXA using statistical analyses including correlation, concordance correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis.

Main Results:

  • Skinfold thickness equations demonstrated good correlation with DEXA (correlation coefficients 0.85-0.92).
  • However, Lin's concordance correlation coefficients indicated only moderate agreement (0.702-0.876).
  • Wide Bland-Altman limits of agreement (over 10%) and significant differences in means/variances (Bradley-Blackwood test) highlight poor agreement.

Conclusions:

  • While skinfold thickness equations correlate well with DEXA in adolescents with IBD, their agreement is poor.
  • These equations are not sufficiently accurate for assessing body composition in pediatric IBD patients.
  • Clinical recommendations advise against using skinfold thickness equations for body composition assessment in this population.
Abstract