Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Disease
Klaus J Neis1, Wolfgang Zubke, Mathias Fehr
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Germany, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tübingen University Hospital, Germany, Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Köln-Weyertal, Germany, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Austria, AWMF Institute of Medical Knowledge Management, c/o Philipps University Marburg, Germany.
Hysterectomy satisfaction is high (75-94%) with vaginal hysterectomy preferred for fewer complications. Patients need counseling on uterus-sparing alternatives for informed decisions regarding benign uterine conditions.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Surgical Procedures
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Hysterectomy is a common gynecological surgery, second only to Cesarean section.
- No German guideline previously addressed hysterectomy indications for benign conditions considering alternatives.
- Uterus-preserving treatments offer alternatives to hysterectomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop clinical recommendations for hysterectomy indications in benign uterine conditions.
- To integrate evidence on uterus-preserving alternatives into clinical practice.
- To reduce the frequency of abdominal hysterectomy.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of Medline (2013, 2014, Dec 2015).
- Assessment of aggregate evidence from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials.
- Guideline recommendations developed via a consensus process with moderation.
Main Results:
- High patient satisfaction (75-94%) reported for both hysterectomy and organ-preserving alternatives.
- Vaginal hysterectomy demonstrated lower complication rates and faster recovery compared to abdominal hysterectomy.
- Laparoscopic hysterectomy recommended if vaginal approach is not feasible; abdominal hysterectomy reserved for specific indications.
- Uterus-preserving techniques showed higher reintervention rates (11-36%) versus hysterectomy (4-10%).
Conclusions:
- The primary goal is to decrease the incidence of abdominal hysterectomy.
- Informed patient decision-making is crucial, requiring counseling on uterus-sparing options.
- Promoting vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy over abdominal hysterectomy is recommended.
More Related Videos
03:01Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
05:21Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025