Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

An Air-liquid Interface Bronchial Epithelial Model for Realistic, Repeated Inhalation Exposure to Airborne Particles for Toxicity Testing
Published on: May 13, 2020
Combining exposure and effect modeling into an integrated probabilistic environmental risk assessment for
Rianne Jacobs1, Johannes A J Meesters2, Cajo J F Ter Braak1
1Biometris, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
This study presents a new probabilistic method for environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs). It effectively models variability and uncertainty, improving transparency and guiding future research.
Area of Science:
- Environmental toxicology
- Nanotechnology risk assessment
- Environmental chemistry
Background:
- Environmental risk assessment (ERA) for engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) is crucial but hindered by data gaps regarding ENP fate and toxicity.
- Existing ERA methods struggle with uncertainty, limiting reliable risk characterization for ENPs.
- Probabilistic methods offer a robust approach to manage and quantify uncertainty in risk assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and demonstrate a novel probabilistic method for modeling both variability and uncertainty in ENP environmental risk assessment.
- To enable separate modeling of variability and uncertainty to identify sources of variation in risk assessment outcomes.
- To enhance the transparency and direction of future environmental and toxicological research for ENPs.
Main Methods:
- Developed a probabilistic method based on the concentration ratio and the exposure-to-critical-effect concentration ratio, treating both as random variables.
- Modeled variability and uncertainty separately within the risk assessment framework.
- Applied the method to a simplified aquatic risk assessment scenario involving nano-titanium dioxide (TiO2).
Main Results:
- The developed method successfully models variability and uncertainty independently in ENP risk assessment.
- The approach allows users to distinguish the contributions of variability versus uncertainty to the overall risk assessment outcome.
- Demonstrated application with nano-titanium dioxide provides a transparent risk assessment example.
Conclusions:
- The new method enhances transparency in environmental risk assessment for engineered nanoparticles.
- Separating variability and uncertainty modeling provides clearer insights into risk assessment components.
- This approach can effectively direct future research efforts toward critical data gaps in ENP environmental toxicology and fate.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Exposure, Response and Effect
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

