Heparin for the prevention of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants

Matteo Bruschettini1, Olga Romantsik, Simona Zappettini

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Insights

Prophylactic heparin administration in very preterm infants did not show a significant reduction in intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or neonatal mortality. The limited data suggests that current evidence is insufficient to definitively determine heparin

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Hematology

Background:

  • Preterm birth is a primary risk factor for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in very low birth weight infants.
  • IVH is believed to be venous in origin, with germinal matrix thromboses playing a potential triggering role.
  • Heparin, an anticoagulant, activates antithrombin and may reduce the risk of IVH and parenchymal venous infarct.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic heparin in reducing germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage (GMH-IVH) in very preterm neonates.
  • To compare heparin administration against placebo, no treatment, or other anticoagulants for IVH prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, and cluster trials.
  • Searched major databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL) and congress abstracts (2000-2015).
  • Included studies involved very preterm infants (gestational age < 32 weeks) receiving early heparin administration (within 24 hours of life).

Main Results:

  • Two trials with 155 infants compared low-dose heparin to no heparin in very preterm newborns requiring umbilical catheterization.
  • No significant differences were found in rates of IVH (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61-1.41), severe IVH (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.46-2.23), or neonatal mortality (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.28-1.67).
  • Evidence quality was very low to low, with imprecision in estimates and limitations in study designs. Limited data existed for other outcomes, and no long-term neurodevelopmental data was available.

Conclusions:

  • Very limited data exists on prophylactic heparin's effect on IVH incidence and severity in very preterm neonates.
  • The identified trials used heparin for umbilical line patency, not specifically for GMH-IVH prevention.
  • The imprecise estimates mean results are consistent with potential benefit or harm, precluding a definitive answer on heparin's efficacy for IVH prevention.
Abstract