Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Morphology-Based Distinction Between Healthy and Pathological Cells Utilizing Fourier Transforms and Self-Organizing Maps
Published on: October 28, 2018
The geometry of morphospaces: lessons from the classic Raup shell coiling model
1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EQ, Cambridge, UK.
Raup's morphospace for coiled shells lacks metric properties, hindering evolutionary analysis. A new landmark-based morphospace offers a geometrically sound alternative for studying morphological disparity in ammonoids and other taxa.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Palaeontology
- Theoretical morphology
Background:
- Morphospaces visualize morphological variation but often lack metric properties like distance and direction.
- Raup's iconic morphospace for coiled shells, widely used for ammonoids, is not Euclidean, limiting interpretation of evolutionary patterns.
- Existing morphospaces vary in geometry, complicating comparisons and analyses of morphological differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the limitations of non-Euclidean morphospaces, specifically Raup's model for coiled shells.
- To introduce and validate a landmark-based morphospace with metric properties for analyzing morphological disparity.
- To compare the properties and relationships of Raup's morphospace and the proposed landmark-based morphospace.
Main Methods:
- Development of a landmark-based morphospace using the same measurements as Raup's parameters.
- Simulations to compare the properties of different morphospaces.
- Reanalysis of Palaeozoic ammonoid shell disparity using both morphospace frameworks.
Main Results:
- Raup's morphospace, while useful for shell description, does not guarantee meaningful interpretation of taxon spread and spacing due to its non-Euclidean structure.
- The proposed landmark-based morphospace provides a geometrically sound framework for quantitative analyses of morphological patterns.
- The study highlights algebraic and geometric relationships between Raup's and the landmark-based morphospaces.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative analyses of morphological patterns, particularly shell disparity, should be conducted within the validated landmark-based morphospace.
- Raup's model remains valuable for describing shell coiling geometry but not for rigorous disparity analysis.
- Researchers using diverse morphospaces in evolutionary morphology must exercise caution when interpreting and comparing results.
Related Concept Videos
Gauss's Law: Planar Symmetry
Plastic Deformations of Members with a Single Plane of Symmetry
Gauss's Law: Cylindrical Symmetry
Mohr's Circle for Plane Strain
Mohr's circle visually represents the strain states under various conditions, which is essential for...
Geometry of Hyperbolas
Deformations in a Transverse Cross Section
As the material stretches, it expands or contracts in orthogonal directions to the load. This phenomenon varies...

