Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Association between the Value-Based Purchasing pay for performance program and patient mortality in US hospitals:
Jose F Figueroa1, Yusuke Tsugawa2, Jie Zheng2
1Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
The US Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. This pay-for-performance initiative showed no evidence of improving patient outcomes in incentivized conditions.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Health Economics
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- The US Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program, a Medicare initiative, aims to improve healthcare quality by incentivizing hospitals.
- Understanding the impact of such pay-for-performance programs on patient mortality is crucial for healthcare policy and practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of the HVBP program on 30-day mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia.
- To determine if the HVBP program demonstrated particular benefits for hospitals with lower baseline performance.
Main Methods:
- An observational study analyzed data from 4,267 US acute care hospitals between 2008 and 2013.
- Patient-level data for over 2.4 million admissions were used to assess 30-day risk-adjusted mortality.
- Linear spline analysis examined the association between HVBP participation and mortality trends, comparing incentivized conditions to non-incentivized ones.
Main Results:
- Mortality rates for incentivized conditions showed similar modest declines in both HVBP-participating and non-participating hospitals.
- The difference in mortality trends between participating and non-participating hospitals was not statistically significant.
- No subgroup analysis, including hospitals with poor baseline performance, indicated that HVBP was associated with improved outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence does not support the effectiveness of the HVBP program in reducing 30-day mortality for the studied conditions.
- Policymakers considering similar pay-for-performance models should explore alternative strategies to enhance patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Patient-centered Care
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
