Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: a prognosis-based guideline
Insights
Making decisions for extremely premature infants requires more than gestational age. A new prognosis-based guideline incorporates survival, quality of life, and parental values for better prenatal care decisions.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Perinatal Decision-Making
- Clinical Guideline Development
Background:
- Current prenatal decisions for extremely premature infants rely solely on gestational age, which is insufficient.
- Existing guidelines lack high-quality appraisal criteria for complex neonatal care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel, prognosis-based guideline for prenatal decisions regarding resuscitation of extremely premature infants.
- To incorporate key medical factors, parental values, and quality of life into decision-making.
Main Methods:
- A five-step approach was employed, including systematic reviews and appraisal using the AGREE II framework.
- A multi-disciplinary working group and external consultation were integral to the process.
- Key factors identified included survival, neurodevelopmental disability, quality of life, and maternal outcomes.
Main Results:
- No existing guidelines met high-quality appraisal standards.
- Survival, neurodevelopmental outcomes, quality of life (child and parents), and maternal morbidity were critical decision factors.
- Stakeholders, including parents, emphasized the importance of incorporating patient values and preferences.
Conclusions:
- A new prognosis-based framework was developed to guide the offering of early intensive or palliative care to expectant parents.
- This framework aims to improve prenatal decision-making for extremely premature infants.
- Pre-implementation assessment is ongoing to facilitate the practical application of the guideline.
Objective:
Making prenatal decisions regarding resuscitation of extremely premature infants, based on gestational age alone is inadequate. We developed a prognosis-based guideline.
Study Design:
We followed a five step approach and used the AGREE II framework: (1) systematic review and critical appraisal of published guidelines; (2) identification of key medical factors for decision making; (3) systematic reviews; (4) creation of a multi-disciplinary working group and (5) external consultation and appraisal.
Result:
No published guideline met high-quality appraisal criteria. Survival, neurodevelopmental disability, quality of life of child and parents, and maternal mortality and risk of long-term morbidity were identified as key for quality decision-making. Eighteen stakeholders (including parents) advocated for the incorporation of parents' values and preferences in the process.
Conclusion:
A novel framework, based on prognosis, was generated to guide when early intensive and palliative care may both be offered to expectant parents. Pre-implementation assessment is underway to identify barriers and facilitators to putting in practice.
More Related Videos
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
06:15Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Ethical Dilemmas II
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management