Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Food pantry selection solutions: a randomized controlled trial in client-choice food pantries to nudge clients to
Norbert L W Wilson1, David R Just2, Jeffery Swigert3
1Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Background:
Food pantries and food banks are interested in cost-effective methods to encourage the selection of targeted foods without restricting choices. Thus, this study evaluates the effectiveness of nudges toward targeted foods.
Methods:
In October/November 2014, we manipulated the display of a targeted product in a New York State food pantry. We evaluated the binary choice of the targeted good when we placed it in the front or the back of the category line (placement order) and when we presented the product in its original box or unboxed (packaging).
Results:
The average uptake proportion for the back treatment was 0.231, 95% CI = 0.179, 0.29, n = 205, and for the front treatment, the proportion was 0.337, 95% CI = 0.272, 0.406, n = 238 with an odds ratio of 1.688, 95% CI = 1.088, 2.523. The average uptake for the unboxed treatment was 0.224, 95% CI = 0.174, 0.280, n = 255, and for the boxed intervention, the proportion was 0.356, 95% CI = 0.288, 0.429, n = 188 with an odds ratio of 1.923, 95% CI = 1.237, 2.991.
Conclusions:
Nudges increased uptake of the targeted food. The findings also hold when we control for a potential confounder. Low cost and unobtrusive nudges can be effective tools for food pantry organizers to encourage the selection of targeted foods.
Trial Registration Number:
NCT02403882.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Regulation of Food Intake
Persuasion Strategies

