Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Management of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture
William M Wilson1, Eric M Horlick
1Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Insights
Transcatheter device closure for ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after myocardial infarction offers an alternative to surgery. While technically successful, early closure is linked to high mortality; outcomes improve in the subacute phase or for post-surgical leaks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) carries a high mortality risk.
- Early surgical repair is the traditional recommendation for VSR, irrespective of hemodynamic status.
- Transcatheter device closure has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgical VSR repair.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the efficacy and safety of transcatheter device closure for VSR post-MI.
- To compare outcomes of transcatheter closure versus surgical repair in different clinical scenarios.
- To evaluate the optimal timing and patient selection for transcatheter VSR closure.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and clinical data on transcatheter device closure for VSR.
- Analysis of procedural success rates, complication rates, and in-hospital mortality.
- Comparison of outcomes based on the timing of intervention (early vs. subacute phase) and patient characteristics.
Main Results:
- Transcatheter VSR closure demonstrates a high technical success rate with a low complication rate.
- Early transcatheter closure is associated with high in-hospital mortality.
- Optimal outcomes are observed in the subacute phase post-MI or for managing post-surgical patch leaks, potentially due to patient selection bias.
Conclusions:
- Transcatheter closure is a viable option for VSR, particularly in non-surgical candidates or for post-surgical leaks.
- A hybrid strategy combining early surgical closure with subsequent transcatheter management of residual leaks is favored.
- Long-term outcomes are favorable for patients who survive hospital discharge, regardless of the initial treatment approach.
Abstract:
Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) post acute myocardial infarction is associated with a high mortality rate if not treated. Early surgical repair is recommended regardless of haemodynamic status. We review the role of transcatheter device closure for VSR, which has emerged as an alternative to surgery. The procedure itself has a high technical success rate with a relatively low complication rate; however, it is associated with high in-hospital mortality rates when performed in the early phase. Results post transcatheter closure are best in the subacute phase post MI (in part reflective of a selection bias), or post surgical repair with a patch leak. Transcatheter closure can otherwise be considered in patients who are not surgical candidates, who generally have haemodynamically tolerable defects, and who survive a period of watchful waiting. In general, a hybrid strategy of early surgical closure with transcatheter device closure of a patch leak (if it occurs) is a favoured strategy. Long-term outcomes appear good in patients with or without prior surgery who survive to hospital discharge.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

