Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Diffusion Monte Carlo for Accurate Dissociation Energies of 3d Transition Metal Containing Molecules
Katharina Doblhoff-Dier1, Jörg Meyer1, Philip E Hoggan2
1Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University , Post Office Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands.
Abstract:
Transition metals and transition metal compounds are important to catalysis, photochemistry, and many superconducting systems. We study the performance of diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) applied to transition metal containing dimers (TMCDs) using single-determinant Slater-Jastrow trial wavefunctions and investigate the possible influence of the locality and pseudopotential errors. We find that the locality approximation can introduce nonsystematic errors of up to several tens of kilocalories per mole in the absolute energy of Cu and CuH if Ar or Mg core pseudopotentials (PPs) are used for the 3d transition metal atoms. Even for energy differences such as binding energies, errors due to the locality approximation can be problematic if chemical accuracy is sought. The use of the Ne core PPs developed by Burkatzki et al. (J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 164115), the use of linear energy minimization rather than unreweighted variance minimization for the optimization of the Jastrow function, and the use of large Jastrow parametrizations reduce the locality errors. In the second section of this article, we study the general performance of DMC for 3d TMCDs using a database of binding energies of 20 TMCDs, for which comparatively accurate experimental data is available. Comparing our DMC results to these data for our results that compare best with experiment, we find a mean unsigned error (MUE) of 4.5 kcal/mol. This compares well with the achievable accuracy in CCSDT(2)Q (MUE = 4.6 kcal/mol) and the best all-electron DFT results (MUE = 4.5 kcal/mol) for the same set of systems (Truhlar et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 2036-2052). The mean errors in DMC depend less on the exchange-correlation functionals used to generate the trial wavefunction than the corresponding mean errors in the underlying DFT calculations. Furthermore, the QMC results obtained for each molecule individually vary less with the functionals used. These observations are relevant for systems such as molecules interacting with transition metal surfaces where the DFT functionals performing best for molecules (hybrids) do not yield improvements in DFT. Overall, the results presented in this article yield important guidelines for both the assessment of the achievable accuracy with DMC and the design of DMC calculations for systems including transition metal atoms.
Related Concept Videos
Bond Dissociation Energy and Activation Energy
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Molecular Orbital Theory II

