Interictal high-frequency oscillations generated by seizure onset and eloquent areas may be differentially coupled

Yutaka Nonoda1, Makoto Miyakoshi2, Alejandro Ojeda2

  • 1Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.

Insights

High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) coupled with specific slow-wave frequencies can help differentiate seizure-onset zones from physiological areas in epilepsy patients. This finding aids in improving presurgical evaluations for focal epilepsy.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Epileptology
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are neural signals that can originate from both seizure-onset zones and functionally important brain regions.
  • Distinguishing between epileptogenic and physiological HFOs is crucial for effective presurgical evaluation in focal epilepsy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether coupling patterns between HFOs and slow-wave frequencies can differentiate seizure-onset sites from non-epileptogenic brain areas.
  • To assess the diagnostic performance of HFO rates and modulation indices (MI) in localizing epileptic foci.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 13 children with focal epilepsy using extraoperative electrocorticography during slow-wave sleep.
  • Measurement of HFO rates and modulation indices (MI) reflecting the coupling between HFO amplitude and slow-wave phase.
  • Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to quantify the predictive accuracy (Area Under the Curve - AUC) of different metrics.

Main Results:

  • Increased HFO rates effectively localized seizure-onset sites (AUC ≥ 0.72) but also identified non-epileptogenic sensorimotor-visual sites (AUC ≥ 0.58).
  • Modulation index MI(HFOs)&(3-4Hz) showed similar performance in detecting both seizure-onset (AUC ≥ 0.74) and non-epileptogenic sites (AUC ≥ 0.59).
  • Subtraction-MIHFOs [MI(HFOs)&(3-4Hz) - MI(HFOs)&(0.5-1Hz)] accurately localized seizure-onset sites (AUC ≥ 0.71) while avoiding non-epileptogenic sites (AUC ≤ 0.42).

Conclusions:

  • Epileptogenic HFOs exhibit preferential coupling with 3-4 Hz slow-waves, whereas physiological HFOs show stronger coupling with 0.5-1 Hz slow-waves during sleep.
  • The subtraction-MIHFOs metric demonstrates potential for improved presurgical localization by distinguishing epileptic from physiological HFOs.
  • Further validation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm the utility of slow-wave coupled HFO analysis in presurgical planning for focal epilepsy.
Abstract