Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
[Safety of implantation permanent pacemaker at different times in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy]
Zhanqi Wang1, Hongliang Cong, Zheng Li
1Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin 300051, China.
Objective:
To investigate the safety of implantation permanent pacemaker (PM) at different times in patients with dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES).
Methods:
A total of 105 patients who implanted pacemakers with DAPT therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) after implantation of DES admitted to our hospital from January 2009 to January 2015 were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups: dual antiplatelet therapy (DAP) group: implanting PM within 3 months after coronary stenting, continuous DAPT during perioperative period; low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) bridging group: implanting PM within 3 to 6 months after coronary stenting, DAPT interruption for 5 days replaced with subcutaneous injection of enoxaparin (1 mg/kg), twice per day, enoxaparin was stopped 12 h before operation; asprin group, implanting PM after coronary stenting 6 months, clopidogrel interruption for 5 days. Oral DAPT was returned 12-24 after operation according to the patients' condition. Peri-operative cardiovascular events and bleedings, infections were observed.
Results:
There was no major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and pouch infection were observed among 3 groups in perioperation. The incidence of pocket hemorrhage and errhysis in bridging group was significantly higher than that of DAP group and asprin group (16.7%, 8.0%, 0.0% χ(2)=10.431, P=0.005 and 29.2%, 12.0%, 7.1% χ(2)=6.321, P=0.042 respectively). 3 patients had severe bleeding (12.5%, 3/24) in bridging group; compared with the other 2 groups, there were significant difference (χ(2)=9.161, P=0.010). The incidence of hematoma and hemorrhage of asprin group was lowest.
Conclusions:
LMWH bridging therapy significantly increases the risk of pacemaker pocket hematoma and hemorrhage, and the pacemaker implantation may be safer after DES implantation 6 months.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management

