[Prognosis prediction of febrile neutropenia by MASCC score: A retrospective study]

Louise Cervetti1, Alexis Vallard2, Sylvestre Le Moulec1

  • 1Hôpital d'instruction des armées du Val-de-Grâce, service d'oncologie et radiothérapie, boulevard du Port-Royal, 75013 Paris, France.

Bulletin Du Cancer
|May 17, 2016
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score may not fully identify neutropenic fever patients at risk for complications. Comorbidities and tumor stage require better consideration for outpatient treatment selection.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Hematology
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score is used to assess the risk of severe complications in patients experiencing neutropenic fever following chemotherapy.
  • Neutropenic fever is a common and serious side effect of chemotherapy, necessitating careful risk stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the MASCC score in identifying patients with neutropenic fever who are at risk of complications.
  • To explore factors beyond the MASCC score that may influence complication risk and hospitalization duration.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of a cohort of hospitalized patients diagnosed with neutropenic fever.
  • Assessment of patient complications based on the established criteria of the MASCC score.

Main Results:

  • Of 71 patients (81 episodes), 72% had a MASCC score ≥21, indicating low risk. However, 10 deaths occurred, with a higher proportion in the high-risk group.
  • Comorbidities not accounted for by the MASCC score impacted outcomes in 2 deceased patients.
  • Within the low-risk group, metastatic disease and multiple comorbidities were linked to longer hospital stays.

Conclusions:

  • The MASCC score alone may be insufficient for accurately identifying all patients at risk of complications or suitable for outpatient management.
  • Incorporating comorbidities and tumor stage into risk assessment could improve patient selection for ambulatory treatment.
  • Hospitalization remains crucial for initial neutropenic fever management, and the role of general practitioners needs further definition.