Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
Published on: August 8, 2019
Accuracy of Wristband Activity Monitors during Ambulation and Activities
Ming-DE Chen1, Chang-Chih Kuo, Christine A Pellegrini
11Department of Occupational Therapy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, TAIWAN; 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; and 3Department of Physical Therapy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, TAIWAN.
Purpose:
The main purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of wristband activity monitors on measuring step counts at prescribed speeds on a treadmill and under short bouts of common daily activities.
Methods:
Thirty healthy young adults wore three wristband activity monitors on both wrists while walking or jogging on a treadmill at different speeds (54, 80, 107, and 134 m·min) and performing six different common daily activities for 5 min each. The monitors included the Fitbit Flex, the Garmin Vivofit, and the Jawbone UP. The common daily activity conditions included two sitting activities (playing a tablet computer game and folding laundry), two walking activities (pushing a stroller, carrying a bag), and two stair climbing activities (down and up). Absolute percentage error (APE) scores were computed to examine the accuracy between actual observed steps and monitor-detected steps.
Results:
Under the treadmill condition, the APE ranged between 1.5% and 9.6%. Accuracy was improved at faster speeds (134 m·min) for all the monitors (APE < 2.5%). In the common daily activity conditions, substantial step counts were registered when folding laundry. All monitors significantly underestimated actual steps (all APE >33%) when pushing a stroller. Higher APE was observed when worn on the dominant wrist under the common daily activity conditions.
Conclusions:
The wristband activity monitors examined were more accurate for measuring step counts between 80 and 134 m·min as compared with a slower speed. Accuracy under each common daily activity condition ranged widely between monitors and activity, with less error when worn on the nondominant wrist. These results will help to inform researchers on the use and accuracy of wristband activity monitors for future studies.
More Related Videos
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
06:49Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
Published on: December 11, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...