Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025
Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: February 18, 2022
Retinal arteriolar remodeling evaluated with adaptive optics camera: Relationship with blood pressure levels
A Gallo1, A Mattina1, D Rosenbaum2
1Preventive Cardiovascular Unit, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Unité de Prévention Cardiovasculaire, Service d'Endocrinologie Métabolisme, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Inserm 1146,-CNRS 7371, Laboratoire d'imagerie biomédicale, 75013 Paris, France.
Aim:
To research a retinal arterioles wall-to-lumen ratio or lumen diameter cut-off that would discriminate hypertensive from normal subjects using adaptive optics camera.
Patients And Methods:
One thousand and five hundred subjects were consecutively recruited and Adaptive Optics Camera rtx1™ (Imagine-Eyes, Orsay, France) was used to measure wall thickness, internal diameter, to calculate wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) and wall cross-sectional area of retinal arterioles. Sitting office blood pressure was measured once, just before retinal measurements and office blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure>=140mmHg and diastolic blood pressure>=90mmHg. ROC curves were constructed to determine cut-off values for retinal parameters to diagnose office hypertension. In another population of 276 subjects office BP, retinal arterioles evaluation and home blood pressure monitoring were obtained. The applicability of retinal WLR or diameter cut-off values were compared in patients with controlled, masked, white-coat and sustained hypertension.
Results:
In 1500 patients, a WLR>0.31 discriminated office hypertensive subjects with a 0.57 sensitivity and 0.71 specificity. Lumen diameter<78.2μm discriminated office hypertension with a 0.73 sensitivity and a 0.52 specificity. In the other 276 patients, WLR was higher in sustained hypertension vs normotensive patients (0.330±0.06 vs 0.292±0.05; P<0.001) and diameter was narrower in masked hypertensive vs normotensive subjects (73.0±11.2 vs 78.5±11.6μm; P<0.005).
Conclusion:
A WLR higher than 0.31 is in favour of office arterial hypertension; a diameter under<78μm may indicate a masked hypertension. Retinal arterioles analysis through adaptive optics camera may help the diagnosis of arterial hypertension, in particular in case of masked hypertension.
