Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Self-Measured vs Professionally Measured Waist Circumference.
Barbara G Carranza Leon1, Michael D Jensen2, Jennifer J Hartman3
1Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Self-measured waist circumference is not accurate enough for identifying metabolic syndrome risk. Many individuals, especially women, underestimate their waist size, leading to a high false-negative rate in risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Medicine
- Public Health
- Preventive Cardiology
Background:
- Waist circumference is a key indicator of metabolic risk.
- Logistic challenges hinder routine professional measurement in outpatient settings.
- Accurate waist circumference measurement is crucial for identifying at-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of self-measured waist circumference compared to professional measurements.
- To determine if self-measurement can reliably identify patients at high risk for metabolic syndrome.
Main Methods:
- Medical outpatients and research participants provided self- and professionally measured waist circumferences.
- Standardized pictorial instructions were given for self-measurement.
- Professionals received standard measurement training.
Main Results:
- Self- and professionally measured waist circumferences showed no significant difference overall.
- A significant false-negative rate was observed in self-measurements.
- For women, 57% of normal-weight and 18% of overweight individuals undermeasured waist circumference, missing high-risk status.
Conclusions:
- Self-measured waist circumference has a high false-negative rate, exceeding 20% in some high-risk groups.
- Self-measurement is not a reliable substitute for professional measurement in identifying metabolic syndrome risk.
- Standardized instructions do not fully overcome inaccuracies in self-reported waist circumference.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Self-Discrepancy Theory

