Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER01:29

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

5.4K
ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...
5.4K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

9.9K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
9.9K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

161.1K
Overview
161.1K
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

130.0K
Overview
130.0K
Protein Folding01:25

Protein Folding

12.2K
Proteins are chains of amino acids linked together by peptide bonds. Upon synthesis, a protein folds into a three-dimensional conformation, critical to its biological function. Interactions between its constituent amino acids guide protein folding, and hence the protein structure is primarily dependent on its amino acid sequence.
Protein Structure Is Critical to Its Biological Function
Proteins perform a wide range of biological functions such as catalyzing chemical reactions, providing...
12.2K
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

36.3K
36.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PPIDomainMiner: Inferring domain-domain interactions from multiple sources of protein-protein interactions.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same author

Using restraints in EROS-DOCK improves model quality in pairwise and multicomponent protein docking.

Proteins·2020
Same author

GrAPFI: predicting enzymatic function of proteins from domain similarity graphs.

BMC bioinformatics·2020
Same author

The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens.

Genome biology·2019
Same author

Blind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: The CASP13-CAPRI experiment.

Proteins·2019
Same author

EROS-DOCK: protein-protein docking using exhaustive branch-and-bound rotational search.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Calculating and scoring high quality multiple flexible protein structure alignments.

David W Ritchie1

  • 1Inria Nancy - Grand Est, 54600 Villers-lès-Nancy, France.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|May 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces Kpax 5.0, an improved algorithm for flexible multiple protein structure alignments (MSAs). The new M-score measure demonstrates that accounting for structural flexibility yields higher quality MSAs.

More Related Videos

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.5K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K
Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.5K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Bioinformatics algorithms

Background:

  • Multiple protein structure alignments (MSAs) are crucial for understanding protein family relationships and homology modeling.
  • Existing rigid MSA algorithms have limitations, and few flexible MSA algorithms are available.
  • Incorporating backbone flexibility is key to overcoming these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present novel improvements to the Kpax algorithm for calculating high-quality flexible MSAs.
  • To introduce a new Gaussian-based quality measure, the M-score, for MSAs.
  • To evaluate the performance of flexible MSAs against rigid ones.

Main Methods:

  • Novel improvements to the Kpax algorithm for flexible MSAs.
  • Introduction of the M-score, a Gaussian-based measure for MSA quality.
  • Large-scale evaluation using Homstrad, SABmark, and SISY benchmark sets.

Main Results:

  • Kpax 5.0 enables the calculation of high-quality flexible MSAs.
  • The M-score effectively measures MSA quality, outperforming RMSD-based measures.
  • Flexible alignment approaches, like Kpax and Matt, show superior performance over rigid methods like 3DCOMB.

Conclusions:

  • Accounting for structural flexibility is essential for accurate MSAs.
  • The M-score is a reliable metric for assessing MSA quality.
  • Kpax 5.0 offers a significant advancement in flexible MSA calculation.