Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

390
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
390
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

309
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
309
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models00:57

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

429
Physiological pharmacokinetic models, often called flow-limited or perfusion models, typically assume a swift drug distribution between tissue and venous blood, creating a rapid drug equilibrium. This premise is based on the idea that drug diffusion is extremely fast, and the cell membrane presents no barrier to drug permeation. In this scenario, where no drug binding occurs, the drug concentration in the tissue equals that of the venous blood leaving the tissue. This greatly simplifies the...
429
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

333
Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
333
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.4K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

319
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
319

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From PINNs to PIKANs: recent advances in physics-informed machine learning.

Machine learning for computational science and engineering·2026
Same author

Automatic selection of the best neural architecture for time series forecasting.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

MR-AIV reveals in vivo brain-wide fluid flow with physics-informed AI.

Science advances·2026
Same author

An AI-enabled tool for quantifying overlapping red blood cell sickling dynamics in microfluidic assays.

Lab on a chip·2026
Same author

A Multiscale Signaling-Biophysical Framework Reveals Mechanisms of Macrophage-Mediated RBC Clearance in Sickle Cell and Gaucher Disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

7.2K

Model inversion via multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization: a new paradigm for parameter estimation in haemodynamics,

Paris Perdikaris1, George Em Karniadakis2

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA parisp@mit.edu.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
|May 20, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a computational framework for efficient model inversion using multi-fidelity data and Bayesian optimization. It accurately builds response surfaces and finds optimal parameters with minimal function evaluations, crucial for limited computational budgets.

Keywords:
Bayesian optimizationblood flow simulationsinverse problemsmachine learningmulti-fidelity modellingoutflow conditions

More Related Videos

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver
14:28

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver

Published on: June 27, 2025

1.2K
Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
12:09

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations

Published on: January 8, 2013

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

7.2K
Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver
14:28

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver

Published on: June 27, 2025

1.2K
Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
12:09

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations

Published on: January 8, 2013

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Science
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Optimization

Background:

  • Model inversion is computationally intensive, often requiring numerous function evaluations.
  • Multi-fidelity data offers a cost-effective way to improve model accuracy.
  • Bayesian optimization is effective for global optimization but can be sample-inefficient.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computational framework for efficient model inversion.
  • To accurately construct response surfaces in parameter space.
  • To efficiently identify global optima with minimal function evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Multi-fidelity information fusion using correlated Gaussian process surrogates.
  • Auto-regressive stochastic schemes for surrogate training.
  • Bayesian optimization leveraging predictive posterior distributions for adaptive sampling.

Main Results:

  • The framework successfully calibrates parameters in blood flow simulations and solves an elliptic partial differential equation.
  • Demonstrated effective balancing of exploration-exploitation trade-off using predictive posterior variance.
  • Achieved accurate response surface construction and efficient global optimum identification.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework enables practical model inversion under limited computational budgets.
  • Multi-fidelity data fusion significantly enhances the efficiency and accuracy of Bayesian optimization.
  • The methodology is broadly applicable to parameter estimation problems in various scientific domains.