Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Complex infrapopliteal revascularization in elderly patients with critical limb ischemia: impact of multidisciplinary
Lukla Biasi1, Sanjay D Patel2, Talia Lea2
1Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Guy's St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK - luklabiasi@gmail.com.
Insights
Infra-popliteal revascularizations are effective for elderly patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Bypass surgery may offer better mid-term outcomes than endovascular treatment for these high-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Geriatric Medicine
- Cardiovascular Interventions
Background:
- Critical limb ischemia (CLI) incidence is increasing in the elderly population.
- Limited evidence exists on infra-popliteal (IP) revascularization outcomes in octogenarian and nonagenarian CLI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of IP revascularizations in elderly CLI patients.
- To compare outcomes between bypass surgery and endovascular revascularization in this demographic.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a prospectively collected database of octogenarian and nonagenarian patients undergoing IP revascularization (bypass or angioplasty) for CLI (Rutherford 4-6) between 2010-2014.
- Primary endpoints: amputation-free survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years.
- Secondary endpoints: patency rates and limb-salvage (LS) rates analyzed by Kaplan-Meier, with univariate and multivariate analysis for outcome predictors.
Main Results:
- 129 limbs in 120 patients (mean age 85 years) underwent IP revascularization.
- Overall 1-year primary patency: 58%; 2-year: 34%. Overall 1-year AFS: 62%; 2-year: 46%. Overall 2-year LS: 84%. Perioperative mortality: 2%.
- Bypass surgery showed potentially better mid-term secondary patency (72% vs 31% at 2 years) and AFS (68% vs 21% at 2 years) compared to endovascular treatment (P<0.001 for AFS). Diabetes and low eGFR predicted worse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Infra-popliteal revascularization (endovascular or surgical) is feasible and effective in octogenarians and nonagenarians with CLI.
- A patient-tailored approach yields satisfactory outcomes in this high-risk group.
- Bypass surgery may offer superior mid-term secondary patency and AFS rates.
Background:
The incidence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) is exponentially rising among our aging population. There is a paucity of scientific evidence on best management and clinical outcome of infra-popliteal (IP) revascularizations in elderly CLI patients.
Methods:
A prospectively collected database was analyzed to identify consecutive octogenarian and nonagenarian patients who underwent IP revascularizations (bypass or angioplasty) for CLI (Rutherford 4-6) in a single center between 2010-2014. The primary end points were overall amputation-free-survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years. Secondary endpoints were primary, assisted-primary, secondary patency and limb-salvage (LS) rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to find factors predicting outcome.
Results:
A total of 129 limbs in 120 patients were treated with IP bypass (N.=42) and endovascular (N.=87) revascularizations with a mean age of 85(±5) years. The overall primary patency, assisted-primary patency and secondary patency were 58%, 65% and 70%, respectively at 12 months and 34%, 48% and 59% at 24 months. Primary, assisted-primary and secondary patency analyzed by treatment method (endovascular vs. bypass) was 54% vs. 52%, 61% vs. 70%, 69% vs. 75% at 1 year and 21% vs. 36%, 24% vs. 62%, 31% vs. 72% at 2 years. The overall AFS at 12 and 24 months was 62% and 46% respectively; AFS was 71%-68% in the bypass group and 53-21% in the Endovascular group (P<0.001). LS was 89% at 12 months and 84% at 24 months, with no significant difference between the bypass and endovascular groups (P=0.24). The overall perioperative mortality rate was 2%. OS by Kaplan-Meier was 68% and 54% at 1 and 2 years respectively. Diabetes (P=0.046) and low eGFR (P=0.041) were predictors of worse AFS and OS, respectively.
Conclusions:
IP revascularizations (either endovascular or surgical) is feasible and effective in octogenarians and nonagenarians with CLI. By adopting a patient-tailored approach, both revascularizations strategies have satisfactory technical and clinical outcomes in this high-risk group. Subgroup analysis suggests that bypass surgery may have better mid-term secondary patency and AFS rates.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
08:16High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Footpad Vasculature in a Murine Hindlimb Gangrene Model
Published on: March 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care