A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Quality of Physician Quality Reporting System Measures

Brittney A Frankel1, Tara F Bishop2,3,4

  • 1Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 E. 67th St., Room LA-215, New York, NY, 10021, USA. baf2011@med.cornell.edu.

Abstract

Insights

Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) measures increasingly focus on outcomes, especially in surgery. However, PQRS needs improvement to adequately assess quality across all medical specialties and National Quality Strategy priorities.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Quality Assurance
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandates Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) participation for Medicare providers, with financial penalties for non-compliance.
  • Physician perception suggests PQRS reporting does not inherently enhance care quality.
  • Limited research exists on the specific content and applicability of PQRS measures across diverse medical specialties and patient populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the proportion of PQRS measures relevant to different medical specialties, quality measurement types, and National Quality Strategy (NQS) priorities.
  • To examine how quality measurement and NQS priorities differ across medical specialties.
  • To compare PQRS measures from 2011 and 2015.

Main Methods:

  • A categorical qualitative analysis of 2011 and 2015 PQRS individual measures.
  • Measures were analyzed across three domains: medical specialty, type of quality measure, and NQS priority category.
  • Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences and trends.

Main Results:

  • Between 2011 and 2015, a significant shift occurred from process measures to outcome measures (85.4% to 66.5% vs. 12.6% to 29.1%).
  • No significant differences in specialty or NQS category distribution were observed overall.
  • In 2015, surgery specialties showed a higher proportion of outcome measures (61.1%) compared to internal medicine (21.7%) and obstetrics/gynecology (5.9%).
  • Internal medicine had the highest proportion of effective clinical care measures (68.5%), while surgery led in patient safety (31.9%) and care coordination (27.8%) measures.

Conclusions:

  • PQRS measures encompass a wide range of medical specialties and have increased outcome-based reporting, particularly for surgery.
  • PQRS currently lacks sufficient measures for half of the NQS priorities and adequate outcome measures for internal medicine and obstetrics/gynecology.
  • Continued refinement of PQRS measures by CMS is essential to effectively assess and promote high-quality care nationwide.

Related Concept Videos

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
3.6K
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting01:20

Introduction to Documentation and Reporting

Documentation is the systematic process of formally recording, maintaining, and communicating information.
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive...
3.4K
Purpose of Health Records I01:11

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
1.9K
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
1.6K
Data Collection III01:05

Data Collection III

The physical assessment examines the patient for objective data that defines the patient's condition, and aids in formulating the nursing care plan. The purpose of physical assessment is a health status appraisal, which includes identifying health problems, and establishing a database for nursing intervention.
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
4.8K
Data Reporting and Recording01:24

Data Reporting and Recording

Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...
5.6K