Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Longitudinal Studies
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Biases in Healthcare AI and Their Impact on Patient Empowerment: A Scoping Review.
Logic Models on Health Information Technology: First Insights from a Cross-Disciplinary Scoping Review.
Cross-Institutional Data Harmonization for AI in Nursing Care Using the OMOP CDM.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
Published on: March 19, 2021
Publishing Health IT Evaluation Studies.
Elske Ammenwerth1, Nicolet F de Keizer2
1UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Improving health IT evaluation studies requires adherence to reporting guidelines. STARE-HI guidelines enhance publication quality, strengthening evidence for health informatics.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:27Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty
Published on: October 6, 2016
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Medical Informatics
- Health IT Evaluation
Background:
- Scientific progress relies on high-quality study evidence.
- Health IT evaluation studies often suffer from low publication quality.
- This hinders systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present STARE-HI guidelines for health IT evaluation studies.
- To emphasize the importance of reporting guidelines.
- To improve the quality of published health IT evidence.
Main Methods:
- Overview of existing publication guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, PRISMA).
- Detailed presentation of the STARE-HI guidelines.
- Discussion on the impact of guidelines on evidence quality.
Main Results:
- Existing guidelines like CONSORT and PRISMA are relevant.
- STARE-HI guidelines are specifically designed for health IT evaluation.
- Adherence to guidelines can improve evidence quality.
Conclusions:
- Health IT evaluation publications must follow established guidelines.
- Guidelines improve evidence quality and reduce bias.
- This supports evidence-based health informatics.