Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Analysis of Cerebral Vasospasm in a Murine Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with High Frequency Transcranial Duplex Ultrasound
Published on: June 3, 2021
Hemorrhage from cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic pooled analysis
1Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona; and.
Insights
Prior hemorrhage significantly increases the risk of future bleeding in cavernous malformations (CMs). Other factors like age, sex, and location do not appear to be significant risk factors for CM hemorrhage.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Neurosurgery
- Vascular Malformations
Background:
- Cavernous malformations (CMs) are vascular anomalies with a risk of hemorrhage.
- Understanding the hemorrhage rate and associated risk factors is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the overall annual hemorrhage rate for cavernous malformations.
- To identify significant risk factors associated with CM hemorrhage.
Main Methods:
- A systematic, pooled analysis of English-language studies from the PubMed database was conducted.
- Included studies focused on the natural history, annual hemorrhage rates, and risk factors of CMs.
- Data extraction included demographic data, hemorrhage rates, and risk factors.
Main Results:
- The annual hemorrhage rate for CMs was 2.5% per patient-year.
- Prior CM hemorrhage was identified as a significant risk factor (HR 3.73, p = 0.02).
- Younger age, female sex, deep location, size, multiplicity, and associated developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) were not significant risk factors.
Conclusions:
- Prior hemorrhage is a significant predictor of future bleeding in cavernous malformations.
- Factors such as age, sex, CM location, size, multiplicity, and associated DVAs were not found to be significant risk factors.
- Future research should focus on prospective rates of seizure and non-hemorrhagic neurological deficits alongside hemorrhage rates.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to define an overall cavernous malformation (CM) hemorrhage rate and risk factors for hemorrhage. METHODS The authors performed a systematic, pooled analysis via the PubMed database through October 2015 using the terms "cavernoma," "cavernous malformation," "natural history," "bleeding," and "hemorrhage." English-language studies providing annual rates and/or risk factors for CM hemorrhage were included. Data extraction, performed independently by the authors, included demographic data, hemorrhage rates, and hemorrhage risk factors. RESULTS Across 12 natural history studies with 1610 patients, the mean age at presentation was 42.7 years old and 52% of patients (95% CI 49%-55%) were female. Presentation modality was seizure in 30% (95% CI 25%-35%), hemorrhage in 26% (95% CI 17%-37%), incidental in 17% (95% CI 9%-31%), and focal deficits only in 16% of cases (95% CI 11%-23%). CM location was lobar in 66% (95% CI 61%-70%), brainstem in 18% (95% CI 13%-24%), deep supratentorial in 8% (95% CI 6%-10%), and cerebellar in 8% (95% CI 5%-11%). Pooling 7 studies that did not assume CM presence since birth, the annual hemorrhage rate was 2.5% per patient-year over 5081.2 patient-years of follow-up (95% CI 1.3%-5.1%). Pooling hazard ratios across 5 studies that evaluated hemorrhage risk factors, prior CM hemorrhage was a significant risk factor for hemorrhage (HR 3.73, 95% CI 1.26-11.1; p = 0.02) while younger age, female sex, deep location, size, multiplicity, and associated developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) were not. CONCLUSIONS Although limited by the heterogeneity of incorporated reports and selection bias, this study found prior hemorrhage to be a significant risk factor for CM bleeding, while age, sex, CM location, size, multiplicity, and associated DVAs were not. Future natural history studies should compound annual hemorrhage rate with prospective seizure and nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit rates.
Related Concept Videos
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Chemical Equilibria: Systematic Approach to Equilibrium Calculations
The first step is to identify all the chemical reactions involved, The...
Cerebral Hemispheres

